Call for vote on reverting runtime deprecation of using Buffer without new on v7

[evanlucas]

Ref: nodejs/node#9529

/cc @nodejs/ctc

I would like for us to come to a resolution before next week if possible.

If you are in favor of reverting the change, please comment with +1
If you are in favor of leaving the change in, please comment with a -1
If you would like to abstain from the vote, please comment with abstain

---

VOTE STATUS TABLE

Vote	Count
In favor	7 (@addaleax @evanlucas @jasnell @indutny @mhdawson @thealphanerd @ofrobots)
Opposed	3 (@ChALkeR @mscdex @thefourtheye)
Abstain	6 (@Fishrock123 @Trott @cjihrig @shigeki @bnoordhuis @rvagg)
Total needed to pass/reject	7
Not yet voted	3 (@chrisdickinson @misterdjules @trevnorris)

Total needed to pass/reject is calculated with:

const ctcSize = 19;
return Math.floor((ctcSize - abstainVotes) / 2) + 1;

[addaleax]

+1

[evanlucas]

+1

[ChALkeR]

-1 for reverting now.

We don't have the current usage data (working on that), and I am uncertain how would this affect the future deprecation of Buffer(arg).

[Trott]

we don't have the current usage data

For the benefit of people who weren't at the meeting: This is data you are collecting and expect to have next week some time? (Correct me if I'm wrong about that, of course!)

I am uncertain how would this affect the future deprecation of Buffer(arg).

For clarity, is this a correct understanding?: You are opposed to removing this deprecation in version 7 if it means that we are not committed to a runtime deprecation in version 8. Removing in version 7 with a plan to put it back in version 8 might be OK. But removing and never putting it back is unacceptable.

[joshgav]

Notes from today's CTC meeting on this are here and in #37.

[ChALkeR]

This is data you are collecting and expect to have next week some time.

That is just the data on how the usage of Buffer(arg) without new has changed in the topmost packages — that would be available soon, hopefully in two days.

Taking dependencies into an account is harder, and that doesn't work yet in an automatic way, so it probably won't be ready next week.

You are opposed to removing this deprecation in version 7 if it means that we are not committed to a runtime deprecation in version 8. Removing in version 7 with a plan to put it back in version 8 might be OK. But removing and never putting it back is unacceptable.

Yes, that is correct. One notice, though — putting it back should have a «deprecated for security reasons» warning, a link to the explanation (on the reasons behind and how to fix things), and we probably should decide on the messaging of this before doing the revert in question here.

[jasnell]

+1 for reverting the current runtime deprecation. My preference would be to
replace with a new off-by-default deprecated-in-docs notice as suggested in
my recent pr.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 9:04 AM Evan Lucas notifications@github.com wrote:

Ref: nodejs/node#9529 nodejs/node#9529

/cc @nodejs/ctc https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/teams/ctc

I would like for us to come to a resolution before next week if possible.

If you are in favor of reverting the change, please comment with +1
If you are in favor of leaving the change in, please comment with a -1
If you would like to abstain from the vote, please comment with abstain

—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#36, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAa2eWBbp6_qlG8ZJDYPsMlEnM6pFktQks5rBHIzgaJpZM4K61SV
.

[indutny]

👍

[Fishrock123]

Abstaining

[ChALkeR]

@indutny, is that +1? (Just trying to be clear 😄).

Some old stats from a month ago: on 2016-10-22, there were approx. 1372 packages directly affected by this deprecation, 1127 were affected outside of the tests directories.

New stats (from today) will be available soon.

I can't tell the exact number of indirectly affected packages atm, though, but I'm going to do a rough estimation.

[Trott]

Abstaining, at least for now. I think this runtime deprecation should be rolled back for version 7, but I share @ChALkeR's concern that this might become a (bad) reason to never runtime deprecate the Buffer constructor ever. "We tried to deprecate it once before and it was horrible for everyone."

[Trott]

(I added a table indicating the status of the vote in the opening comment for this issue.)

[cjihrig]

Abstain

[mhdawson]

+1 to revert.