Skip to content

Conversation

@kvakil
Copy link
Contributor

@kvakil kvakil commented Sep 24, 2022

Frankly, this code is currently unused and it probably makes more sense to remove all of it entirely. But if we keep it, let's fix this typo I noticed.

Frankly, this code is currently unused and it probably makes more sense
to remove all of it entirely. But if we keep it, let's fix this typo I
noticed.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 24, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 77.14% // Head: 73.16% // Decreases project coverage by -3.97% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (0d4f9a7) compared to base (39b38a9).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #418      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.14%   73.16%   -3.98%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines        5023     5072      +49     
==========================================
- Hits         3875     3711     -164     
- Misses       1148     1361     +213     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/llv8-constants.cc 82.75% <100.00%> (+1.91%) ⬆️
src/node-inl.h 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
src/node.h 25.00% <0.00%> (-75.00%) ⬇️
src/node-constants.cc 31.50% <0.00%> (-58.91%) ⬇️
src/node.cc 38.09% <0.00%> (-52.39%) ⬇️
test/plugin/workqueue-test.js 51.85% <0.00%> (-48.15%) ⬇️
src/llnode.cc 60.85% <0.00%> (-14.95%) ⬇️
src/llnode_api.cc 85.41% <0.00%> (-10.42%) ⬇️
src/llv8-inl.h 74.96% <0.00%> (-7.97%) ⬇️
src/llnode.h 85.71% <0.00%> (-4.77%) ⬇️
... and 8 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

kvakil added a commit to kvakil/llnode that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2022
This test failed a couple of times in nodejs#415, nodejs#417 and nodejs#418, so let's skip
it for now.
kvakil added a commit to kvakil/llnode that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2022
This test failed a couple of times in nodejs#415, nodejs#417 and nodejs#418, so let's skip
it for now.
@No9 No9 self-requested a review September 24, 2022 08:27
Copy link
Member

@No9 No9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like a copy/paste error and the fix is straight forward.
LGTM

@No9 No9 merged commit ba9be84 into nodejs:main Sep 25, 2022
@No9
Copy link
Member

No9 commented Sep 25, 2022

Thanks @kvakil - Simple fix so I'm merging

No9 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2022
This test failed a couple of times in #415, #417 and #418, so let's skip
it for now.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants