Skip to content

Conversation

@Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Mar 19, 2016

Backport of #5670 for v4.x

The format of certain code comments in the path documentation results
in the code blocks being invalid. I also find it confusing at least as
formatted on the website. This change is intended to improve those
comments.

The format of certain code comments in the `path` documentation results
in the code blocks being invalid. I also find it confusing at least as
formatted on the website. This change is intended to improve those
comments.
@Trott Trott added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. path Issues and PRs related to the path subsystem. lts-watch-v4.x labels Mar 19, 2016
@benjamingr
Copy link
Member

LGTM

1 similar comment
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 21, 2016

LGTM

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2016
The format of certain code comments in the `path` documentation results
in the code blocks being invalid. I also find it confusing at least as
formatted on the website. This change is intended to improve those
comments.

PR-URL: #5797
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 21, 2016

Landed in v4.x-staging in ebce6ee

@jasnell jasnell closed this Mar 21, 2016
@MylesBorins MylesBorins removed their assignment Mar 21, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2016
The format of certain code comments in the `path` documentation results
in the code blocks being invalid. I also find it confusing at least as
formatted on the website. This change is intended to improve those
comments.

PR-URL: #5797
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2016
The format of certain code comments in the `path` documentation results
in the code blocks being invalid. I also find it confusing at least as
formatted on the website. This change is intended to improve those
comments.

PR-URL: #5797
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Trott Trott deleted the mud4 branch January 13, 2022 22:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. path Issues and PRs related to the path subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants