Skip to content

Conversation

@affinity-matrix
Copy link

No description provided.

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented Feb 19, 2015

This language is all an oversight from when we removed pure consensus for membership. Good catch.

+1

@piscisaureus
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, landed in 664f5ed.

@piscisaureus
Copy link
Contributor

@emilyrose BTW all that unicode in your name looks really suspicious:

rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2015
PR: #898
Reviewed-by: Bert Belder <bertbelder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Mikeal Rogers <mikeal.rogers@gmail.com>
@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Feb 20, 2015

FYI I force-pushed an ammendment to the commit message, simply s/Doc:/doc:/ because I'm getting a 1.3.0 changelog ready and am grouping by commit message prefix and this one stands out

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@rvagg might wana note that under the commit too

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants