Conversation
Co-authored-by: dominikus.nold <dominikus.nold@web.de>
- Add --batch-updates option to plan update-feature command - Add --batch-updates option to plan update-story command - Add --list-findings option to plan review command with structured output - Refactor review function to reduce complexity - Add comprehensive e2e tests for batch updates - Update documentation and prompts to prefer batch updates - Update version to 0.7.0
…itioning - Updated all examples and guides with CLI-first messaging - Added Integration Showcases references throughout documentation - Emphasized integration diversity (VS Code, Cursor, GitHub Actions, pre-commit) - Updated brownfield showcase examples with integration workflow sections - Updated platform-frontend CMS to link to Integration Showcases README - Reviewed and aligned all brownfield documentation for CLI-first approach - Updated version to 0.7.1 Files updated: - All docs/examples/ files (6 files) - All docs/guides/ files (6 files) - docs/reference/directory-structure.md - platform-frontend/iac/scripts/payload-content-helper.js - Version files: pyproject.toml, setup.py, src/__init__.py, src/specfact_cli/__init__.py - CHANGELOG.md with comprehensive 0.7.1 entry
- Fixed basedpyright warnings for repo_path.exists() in contract decorators - Added isinstance() type guard to properly narrow Path | None types - Updated Example 3 validation status to FULLY VALIDATED (CI/CD workflow verified in production) - Updated documentation to reflect Example 3 is validated in specfact-cli repository CI/CD Fixes type checking errors reported in GitHub Actions workflow: - constitution_evidence_extractor.py:65:53 - Type of "exists" is unknown - Fixed in all three methods: extract_article_vii_evidence, extract_article_viii_evidence, extract_article_ix_evidence Example 3 Status Update: - Changed from "COMMANDS VERIFIED" to "FULLY VALIDATED" - Validated in production CI/CD (specfact-cli PR #28) - Workflow successfully runs specfact repro and blocks PRs when validation fails
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR includes:
contracts=Noneandclarifications=NoneparametersStructuredFormatby usingtyping.Optionalinstead of union syntaxChanges
Type Checking Fixes
contracts=NonetoStoryconstructors in test filesclarifications=NonetoPlanBundleconstructors in test filesStructuredFormatforward reference issues instructured_io.pyand command filesCI/CD Improvements
.github/workflows/pr-orchestrator.ymlto fail on type checking errorsVersion Update
pyproject.toml,setup.py, and__init__.pyfilesTesting
All tests pass:
Related