fix: regression of readme heading

[garthdw]

Fix regression for #881

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
npmx.dev	Error		Feb 5, 2026 7:59pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
docs.npmx.dev	Ignored	Preview	Feb 5, 2026 7:59pm
npmx-lunaria	Ignored		Feb 5, 2026 7:59pm

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes adjust presentational styling in the package page's Readme section. The container's bottom margin is reduced from mb-4 to mb-3, and the readme link anchor element has its vertical and horizontal padding (py-4 px-2) removed whilst retaining other styling properties. These are purely spacing and padding adjustments with no functional or behavioural modifications.

Possibly related PRs

• fix(ui): minor padding adjustment for readme heading #881: Modifies README presentation styling in the same package page component file with related spacing changes.

Suggested reviewers

• danielroe

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check	✅ Passed	The description clearly references a specific pull request regression fix, directly relating to the changeset which adjusts spacing/padding in the package readme section.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[trueberryless]

I'm confused. Weren't these changes already made in #881?
Or did they get reverted by accident? Do you have a link to when they were change the last time? That would be awesome 🙌

[garthdw]

I'm confused. Weren't these changes already made in #881?

Or did they get reverted by accident? Do you have a link to when they were change the last time? That would be awesome 🙌

It appears to have been reverted as part of #904 (comment)

[trueberryless]

Ah, that makes sense then 👍
Could you update the PR description to include this link to your comment as well, that would make it clearer 🙏

LGTM then 🥳