Slin/doc fix 2#92
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @slin1237, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request primarily focuses on improving the project's documentation. It updates the README.md to accurately reflect the components of the OME architecture, ensuring that users have a complete understanding of the system's capabilities.
Highlights
- Documentation Update: The
README.mdfile has been updated to includeBenchmarkJobas a core OME component, clarifying its purpose in measuring model performance under different workloads.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the README.md to include the BenchmarkJob component in the list of OME's core components. The change is a good addition to the documentation. I've provided one suggestion to make the description of BenchmarkJob more specific and aligned with the detailed documentation, which would improve clarity for new users.
| - **BaseModel/ClusterBaseModel:** Define model sources and metadata | ||
| - **ServingRuntime/ClusterServingRuntime:** Define how models are served | ||
| - **InferenceService:** Connects models to runtimes for deployment | ||
| - **BenchmarkJob:** Measures model performance under different workloads |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current description for BenchmarkJob is a bit generic. While not incorrect, it could be more descriptive of the component's function. A more specific description that highlights its role in automating benchmarking for inference services would provide more clarity for users at a glance and align better with the detailed documentation.
| - **BenchmarkJob:** Measures model performance under different workloads | |
| - **BenchmarkJob:** Automates performance benchmarking of inference services |
* [doc] add missing benchmark in readme * [misc] add pr labeler
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
n/a
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?