Skip to content

Minor adjustments for imagej-omero (rebased onto develop)#2263

Merged
joshmoore merged 4 commits intoome:developfrom
joshmoore:rebased/develop/imagej-omero-0.1.0
Apr 9, 2014
Merged

Minor adjustments for imagej-omero (rebased onto develop)#2263
joshmoore merged 4 commits intoome:developfrom
joshmoore:rebased/develop/imagej-omero-0.1.0

Conversation

@joshmoore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is the same as gh-2173 but rebased onto develop.


Various small fixes and improvements found while working on https://github.com/imagej/imagej-omero/issues?milestone=3&state=open with @ctrueden.

For review:

  • Addition of OMERO_HOME should have no impact on scripts. (In fact, it can likely be considered part of the public API) /cc @will-moore
  • Similarly, bin/omero script params /test.py should now print out both stdout and stderr to help in debugging (See 'Can't find params' should list stdout file ID imagej/imagej-omero#18)
  • @ximenesuk: the filtering for org.bushe likely isn't needed, but as we will need to consider which logback configuration we're going to pass to background Java tasks.

Happy to break this up if need be, but I wanted to get it open for discussion.

@joshmoore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

--rebased-from #2173

@joshmoore joshmoore restored the rebased/develop/imagej-omero-0.1.0 branch April 8, 2014 06:52
@will-moore
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Following instructions on #2173 this seems fine. Stdout and Stderr files generated as expected and OMERO_HOME is available to script.
Good to merge.

joshmoore added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2014
…0.1.0

Minor adjustments for imagej-omero (rebased onto develop)
@joshmoore joshmoore merged commit 04d9cfc into ome:develop Apr 9, 2014
@joshmoore joshmoore deleted the rebased/develop/imagej-omero-0.1.0 branch April 9, 2014 12:44
@sbesson sbesson added this to the 5.1.0-m1 milestone Oct 14, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants