Spw grid view#4863
Conversation
|
Tested using http://web-dev-merge.openmicroscopy.org/webclient/usertags/?show=tag-14953 user-3 Safari Works as expected:
Not working as expected:
|
|
I still struggle with this whole data model... in the clients we have runs and fields, in the data model there are plateacquisitions, wellsamples, etc. is that the same, how does that fit together? |
|
Yes, plate acquisitions are runs, well samples are fields. You'll tend to find the former terms more in the guts of the system and the latter more as we face users. |
|
As expected, lots of robot failures: https://ci.openmicroscopy.org/view/Failing/job/OMERO-DEV-merge-robotframework/400/robot/ |
|
To test last commit: resize thumbnails in both panels and also resize lower panel. |
|
Ditto to all points raised by @gusferguson in #4863 (comment), including the Bug with Tags not containing wells in Tags tab. I have one more issue: When the numerals are added (going from 9 to 10, i.e. from 1 to 2 numerals) there is a sudden formatting shift in lower pane (images). I do not see this as desirable. |
|
Conflicting PR. Removed from build OMERO-DEV-merge-push#458. See the console output for more details.
|
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Add plates to the jstree data structure | ||
| // Add acquistions (runs) to the jstree data structure |
| get_connection(userB).getUpdateService().saveObject(image_link) | ||
|
|
||
| # links is: project, dataset, image, screen, plate, acquisition | ||
| # links is: project, dataset, image, screen, plate, acquisition, well, well |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's what's returned in the array (2 wells).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Because we want to test the retrieval of 2 wells
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could you add a check for naming of columns/rows i.e. number vs letter
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's what we're testing here: See def expected_wells(user, wells): which generates the dictionary that we compare to what's returned by the tagged json, and includes 'name'.
|
@pwalczysko Last commits fix the slider display as reported in #4863 (comment) |
|
The slider display and the reformatting of the borders is great. |
|
Agree with @pwalczysko - layout and sliders look good. |
|
Great, if we can get this merged now, I can fix conflicts with #4708 and re-open it. Thanks. |
|
One item that has not been addressed in this PR is the unticked item in the description We can certainly do that in another PR Currently we have for example B4, and we have no way to find where that well is |
|
https://trello.com/c/GxqDnD0P/211-spw-follow-up for next actions |
|
Conflicting PR. Removed from build OMERO-DEV-merge-push#489. See the console output for more details.
|
|
Conflicting PR. Removed from build OMERO-DEV-merge-push#490. See the console output for more details.
|
|
Conflicting PR. Removed from build OMERO-DEV-merge-push#491. See the console output for more details.
|
|
Conflicting PR. Removed from build OMERO-DEV-merge-push#492. See the console output for more details.
|
|
Conflicting PR. Removed from build OMERO-DEV-merge-push#493. See the console output for more details.
|
|
Conflicting PR. Removed from build OMERO-DEV-merge-push#494. See the console output for more details.
|
|
Merging so we can move forward |


What this PR does
First PR towards support for new SPW 'grid' layout.
This introduces a few changes, but not "full support" of ome/design#52
This PR does not support a number of 'grid view' features (to come in future PRs)
Testing this PR
TODO for this PR:
marshal_taggedin tree.py to testwells