Skip to content

chore(main): release openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider 0.1.12#96

Merged
josecolella merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

chore(main): release openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider 0.1.12#96
josecolella merged 2 commits intomainfrom
release-please--branches--main--components--openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider

Conversation

@openfeaturebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot commented Mar 9, 2026

🤖 I have created a release beep boop

0.1.12 (2026-03-09)

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • resolve flaky rate-limit date test and correct flipt version-file path (f9fecc4)

✨ New Features


This PR was generated with Release Please. See documentation.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request automates the release of the openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider to version 0.1.12. This update primarily incorporates a crucial bug fix that enhances the provider's stability by addressing a flaky rate-limit date test and rectifying an incorrect file path, ensuring more robust and reliable operation.

Highlights

  • Version Update: The openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider has been released at version 0.1.12.
  • Bug Fix: A bug fix was included to resolve a flaky rate-limit date test and correct a flipt version-file path.
Changelog
  • providers/openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider/CHANGELOG.md
    • resolve flaky rate-limit date test and correct flipt version-file path
Activity
  • This pull request was automatically generated by Release Please.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is an automated release for the openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider. While the version bumps across the files are correct for the release, I've identified a couple of issues in the CHANGELOG.md that should be addressed. The release dates appear to be consistently set in the future, which likely indicates a misconfiguration in the release automation. Furthermore, the changelog entry for this new version seems to include details about a fix for a different provider, which could be confusing. My specific comments provide more details on these points.

@@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
# Changelog

## [0.1.12](https://github.com/open-feature/ruby-sdk-contrib/compare/openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider/v0.1.11...openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider/v0.1.12) (2026-03-09)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The date for this release is listed as (2026-03-09). Looking at the history in this file, other recent releases also have dates in 2025 and 2026. This pattern suggests a potential misconfiguration in the automated release process that is generating these dates.

Comment thread providers/openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider/CHANGELOG.md
Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <109696520+openfeaturebot@users.noreply.github.com>
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot force-pushed the release-please--branches--main--components--openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider branch from 00032c9 to eca18fc Compare March 9, 2026 21:42
@josecolella josecolella merged commit 0d085cc into main Mar 9, 2026
3 checks passed
@josecolella josecolella deleted the release-please--branches--main--components--openfeature-go-feature-flag-provider branch March 9, 2026 22:27
@openfeaturebot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants