-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
chore: Update Rubocop and pull in recommended plugins #72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ | ||
| require: | ||
| - rubocop-rake | ||
| - rubocop-rspec | ||
|
|
||
| AllCops: | ||
| TargetRubyVersion: 2.7 | ||
| NewCops: enable | ||
|
|
@@ -20,9 +24,27 @@ Metrics/BlockLength: | |
| - 'spec/**/*.rb' | ||
| - 'openfeature-sdk.gemspec' | ||
|
|
||
| Gemspec/DevelopmentDependencies: | ||
| EnforcedStyle: gemspec | ||
|
|
||
| Gemspec/RequireMFA: | ||
| Enabled: false | ||
|
|
||
| Style/DocumentDynamicEvalDefinition: | ||
| # TODO re-enable after figuring out what it actually wants | ||
| Enabled: false | ||
|
|
||
| RSpec/ContextWording: | ||
| Enabled: false | ||
|
Comment on lines
+37
to
+38
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Since we're using the OpenFeature specification language, disabling this rule as it will constantly be violated. |
||
|
|
||
| RSpec/MultipleExpectations: | ||
| Max: 2 | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I always find the single default expecation max as overly punitive; I think 2 is a much more reasonable default. |
||
|
|
||
| RSpec/NestedGroups: | ||
| Enabled: false | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Again, since we're using the specification language and nesting, I think having a maximum here is overly restrictive. |
||
|
|
||
| RSpec/PendingWithoutReason: | ||
| Enabled: false | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think the pending output is readable enough without a reason. |
||
|
|
||
| RSpec/SpecFilePathFormat: | ||
| Enabled: false | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Discussion around this started in #71 |
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -34,7 +34,9 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |spec| | |
| spec.add_development_dependency "markly" | ||
| spec.add_development_dependency "rake", "~> 13.0" | ||
| spec.add_development_dependency "rspec", "~> 3.12.0" | ||
| spec.add_development_dependency "rubocop", "~> 1.37.1" | ||
| spec.add_development_dependency "rubocop", "~> 1.56" | ||
| spec.add_development_dependency "rubocop-rake", "~> 0.6" | ||
| spec.add_development_dependency "rubocop-rspec", "~> 2.24" | ||
|
Comment on lines
+37
to
+39
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Honestly, I think we can remove the versioning. Since we use a That makes it a touch easier to update w/o needing to update the gemspec. |
||
| spec.add_development_dependency "simplecov", "~> 0.22.0" | ||
| spec.add_development_dependency "simplecov-cobertura", "~> 2.1.0" | ||
| end | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I typically don't use the
development_dependencystyle and favor usingGemfile, but I opted to use what the project already uses.