Moved otlp_grpc_utils.cc to opentelemetry_exporter_otlp_grpc_client.

[lalitb]

Fixes #1826

Changes

Moved otlp_grpc_utils.cc to opentelemetry_exporter_otlp_grpc_client.

For significant contributions please make sure you have completed the following items:

• CHANGELOG.md updated for non-trivial changes
• Unit tests have been added
• Changes in public API reviewed

[esigo]

Shall we make this consistent with our bazel?

opentelemetry-cpp/exporters/otlp/BUILD

Lines 50 to 64 in 82d8cb4

	name = "otlp_grpc_utils",
	srcs = [
	"src/otlp_grpc_utils.cc",
	],
	hdrs = [
	"include/opentelemetry/exporters/otlp/otlp_grpc_utils.h",
	],
	strip_include_prefix = "include",
	tags = ["otlp"],
	deps = [
	"//api",
	"//sdk:headers",
	"@com_github_grpc_grpc//:grpc++",
	],
	)

[lalitb]

Yes, good point to be consistent with bazel. Will do so

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1829 (5316eb1) into main (82d8cb4) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1829   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.73%   85.73%           
=======================================
  Files         171      171           
  Lines        5240     5240           
=======================================
  Hits         4492     4492           
  Misses        748      748           

[lalitb]

Or should we have single library otlp_grpc_client for both bazel and cmake, as in the latest changes in this PR - I don't see reason to have two different libraries for gRPC stuff.

[esigo]

Or should we have single library otlp_grpc_client for both bazel and cmake, as in the latest changes in this PR - I don't see reason to have two different libraries for gRPC stuff.

Yeah agree. doesn't make sense to have two libs.

[marcalff]

Nit - In the PR description and title:

Added otlp_grpc_utils.cc in the opentelemetry_exporter_otlp_grpc.

->

Moved otlp_grpc_utils.cc to opentelemetry_exporter_otlp_grpc_client.

[ThomsonTan]

Or should we have single library otlp_grpc_client for both bazel and cmake, as in the latest changes in this PR - I don't see reason to have two different libraries for gRPC stuff.

Yeah agree. doesn't make sense to have two libs.

+1. Put all grpc specific code in otlp_grpc_client makes sense for both bazel and cmake.

[marcalff]

Thanks for the fix

[esigo]

LGTM
Thanks for the fix :)