Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| let sandboxed = !matches!( | ||
| &effective_policy, | ||
| codex_core::protocol::SandboxPolicy::DangerFullAccess | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Respect platform sandbox availability
This new sandboxed flag ignores whether the current platform actually has a sandbox. In production we use get_platform_has_sandbox() (see core/src/safety.rs) to track e.g. the experimental Windows sandbox, and previously this code called get_platform_sandbox() to fall back to SandboxType::None when it was disabled. Now we always pass sandboxed = true for any policy that isn’t DangerFullAccess, so on Windows without the sandbox enabled we will still route through exec_windows_sandbox (see core/src/exec.rs around the new if sandboxed { return exec_windows_sandbox(...) }). That configuration is common, and those calls will start failing instead of running unsandboxed. Please gate this bool on get_platform_has_sandbox() the same way we did before.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
@codex fix this build error on non-mac: |
|
Summary
Testing
|
…factor' into nornagon/sandbox-refactor
|
Closing this pull request because it has had no updates for more than 14 days. If you plan to continue working on it, feel free to reopen or open a new PR. |
The sandboxing code has been getting a bit twisty. This is the first step of ??? to iron it out.