[Do not merge] fix: testing the modified test file with legacy code#395
Closed
Akanshu-2u wants to merge 1 commit intoopenedx:masterfrom
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
This served its purpose. Thank you. I’m closing this PR. |
robrap
deleted the
akanshu/testing-get_user_if_exist_testcase_with_legacy_code
branch
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ddtdecorator and data-driven testing (@ddt.ddt,@ddt.data()) are removedIGNORE_LOGGED_IN_USER_ON_MISMATCHsettings) is removed.set_custom_attributemocking) is removed.Note: This code is just for testing if the new test code for
get_user_if_existsfunction , works with the legacy code or not. Do not merge the pr , is just for testing purposes.Reference pr for modified code and test file:
#390