[dunfell] pcsc-lite: provide pcsc-lite-lib-native explicitly for native build#294
Closed
rohieb wants to merge 1 commit intoopenembedded:dunfellfrom
Closed
[dunfell] pcsc-lite: provide pcsc-lite-lib-native explicitly for native build#294rohieb wants to merge 1 commit intoopenembedded:dunfellfrom
rohieb wants to merge 1 commit intoopenembedded:dunfellfrom
Conversation
Commits e2180b0 and 8edd760 added support for native builds for the opensc and pcsc-lite recipes, but building opensc-native fails after commit 40b3a51 (2019-12-04, "opensc: fix RDEPENDS in pcsc PACKAGECONFIG"): ERROR: Required build target 'opensc-native' has no buildable providers. Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['opensc-native', 'pcsc-lite-lib-native'] The commit in question is correct for target builds, but native builds don't have packages. The -lib part is also provided along with pcsc-lite-native, and there is no pcsc-lite-lib-native package. Ideally we would fix this in the opensc recipe. However, using syntax like "PACKAGECONFIG_class-native[pcsc]" in the opensc recipe is apparently not possible to overwrite the dependency for a native build, and using RDEPENDS_remove has no effect either – apparently dependencies from PACKAGECONFIG are added after RDEPENDS_remove is evaluated. Therefore let pcsc-lite provide the missing package name for native builds, even if fixing this unrelated package is not the most elegant solution. Fixes: 40b3a51 (2019-12-04, "opensc: fix RDEPENDS in pcsc PACKAGECONFIG") Signed-off-by: Roland Hieber <rhi@pengutronix.de>
Contributor
|
Yes, Master needs to be fixes first |
Contributor
Author
|
OK, master is fixed now via #295. |
Contributor
Author
|
accidentally deleted the branch... |
Contributor
|
this change is in my testing branch. Just waiting on resources @ home. https://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded-contrib/log/?h=stable/dunfell-nut |
Contributor
Author
|
Have resources @ home arrived? 🙂 |
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Commits e2180b0 and 8edd760 added support for native builds for the opensc and pcsc-lite recipes, but building opensc-native fails after commit 40b3a51:
The commit in question is correct for target builds, but native builds don't have packages. The -lib part is also provided along with pcsc-lite-native, and there is no pcsc-lite-lib-native package.
Ideally we would fix this in the opensc recipe. However, using syntax like "PACKAGECONFIG_class-native[pcsc]" in the opensc recipe is apparently not possible to overwrite the dependency for a native build, and using RDEPENDS_remove has no effect either – apparently dependencies from PACKAGECONFIG are added after RDEPENDS_remove is evaluated. Therefore let pcsc-lite provide the missing package name for native builds, even if fixing this unrelated package is not the most elegant solution.
This is for dunfell, should I create a separate PR for master?