Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses several critical dashboard stability and persistence issues. It refactors how selected dashboards and their arrangements are stored, moving away from volatile identifiers to more stable keys derived from package names and dashboard IDs. Additionally, it introduces consistent sorting for dashboard lists, ensuring a predictable user experience across application restarts. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses several state persistence and UI stability issues on the dashboard screen by using more stable keys for storing the selected dashboard and its arrangement, and sorting the dashboard list for consistent order. However, the fix for stable keys in the in-memory data source introduces a medium-severity Broken Access Control vulnerability. Omitting the deviceId from storage keys causes data to be shared across different devices, leading to cross-device data collisions. Additionally, there's a suggestion to improve the robustness of key generation for dashboard arrangements.
|
Hi @rteyssandier, can we get a new release for these fixes please? 🙏 |
Hi,
I am currently seeing a few behaviour issues on the dashboard screen. This tries to fix all of them.
Until now the whole
DeviceIdAndPackageNameDomainModelwas used as the key, but it also contains the app instance id which changes with every app restart.The issue exists because dashboards can be registered at different points in time during app start (or even later), which returns a new list of dashboards from the room database and that list can have a different order every time.