Add post-MVP capability enhancements to adapter framework design #37
Conversation
WalkthroughThe adapter framework design and sentinel docs add expanded Post‑MVP Enhancements. Adapter doc groups new capabilities: Advanced Resource Management (hooks: onFailure, onNewGeneration, onDeleting; drift reconciliation/restoration), Advanced Error Handling (per-action strategies and recovery workflows), Resource‑Level Controls (per-resource timeouts, retries, onFailure), Additional Features (authentication, resource updates, template caching, batch processing, rate limiting, webhooks, observability), Config Template DSL enhancements (condition match export, resource/action dependencies via when/runAfter), Security Enhancements (namespace-scoped RBAC, dynamic provisioning), and Scalability Enhancements (queue-based autoscaling, metrics HPA). sentinel.md adds Advanced Alerting entries (Dead Man’s Switch, Queue Lag Monitoring). No API signatures changed. Sequence Diagram(s)(omitted — changes are documentation-only and do not introduce a new multi-component runtime control flow requiring a sequence diagram) Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (2)
1419-1424: Refactor repetitive "Resource Management" prefix for readability.Lines ~1420–1422 begin three successive bullets with "Resource Management", which reduces readability. Consider grouping these under a single "Resource Management" subheading or varying the naming to differentiate the bullets.
Current structure:
- **Resource Management `onFailure`**: ... - **Resource Management `onNewGeneration`**: ... - **Resource Management `onDeleting`**: ...Suggested structure:
**Resource Management:** - **`onFailure`**: Configurable behavior when the *workload* represented by the resource fails... - **`onNewGeneration`**: Handling logic when a new resource generation is detected... - **`onDeleting`**: Cleanup logic when parent resource is deleting...
1429-1432: Clarify "Error recovery workflows" description.The line "Error recovery workflows" is significantly less detailed than peer items in this section and elsewhere in the document. Compared to "Per-resource
timeoutconfiguration" or theonFailurelifecycle hooks, this lacks specificity about what workflows entail or how they'd be implemented.Also consider clarifying the relationship between "Advanced Error Handling →
onFailureconfiguration per action" and the newly added "Advanced Resource Management →onFailure" items—are these the same concept (error handling during resource lifecycle) or distinct?If this item is still exploratory for Post-MVP, consider adding a brief note explaining the intent (e.g., "automatic retry chains, circuit breaker patterns, or fallback handlers"). Alternatively, if it overlaps with the resource lifecycle
onFailure, you may consolidate or cross-reference.I can help expand this description or consolidate overlapping concepts if you'd like.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md
[style] ~1423-~1423: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ading deletion, finalizer removal). - Resource Security: Reconciliation and restorat...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (1)
1417-1447: Excellent expansion of Post-MVP capabilities vision.The additions to the Post-MVP Enhancements section provide a comprehensive roadmap of future capabilities. The content is well-organized, logically grouped, and clearly separated from MVP scope. No existing MVP guarantees or behaviors were inadvertently modified.
The new items span a thoughtful range of production-ready features: advanced resource management (lifecycle hooks, drift detection), alerting (Dead Man's Switch, Queue Lag Monitoring), fine-grained control (per-resource timeouts/retries), security (authentication), performance (caching, batch processing, rate limiting), and operational visibility (distributed tracing, custom metrics).
Minor observation: Detail levels vary across items—some (e.g., Advanced Resource Management lifecycle hooks) are well-explained, while others (e.g., Template Caching, Webhook Support) are single-line bullets. Consider expanding shorter items with brief use-case descriptions if time permits, though this is not critical for a design document.
xueli181114
changed the title
xueli181114
force-pushed
the
adapter-future
branch
from
39f6bf3 to
f57c125
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (3)
1419-1426: Inconsistent section title formatting and scope clarification needed.Line 1420 changes the section name from "Advanced Resource Management" to "Resource Management", which differs from the naming pattern used elsewhere (e.g., "Advanced Alerting", "Advanced Error Handling"). Additionally, line 1425's "Resource Security" label uses a different format than the bullet points above it (using a colon prefix instead of consistent bullet formatting).
Recommend standardizing the section title to "Advanced Resource Management:" and reformatting line 1425 to use consistent bullet-point syntax with the items above it.
-**Resource Management:** +**Advanced Resource Management:** - **`onFailure`**: Configurable behavior when the *workload* represented by the resource fails (e.g., Job pod fails, Deployment crashes) after successful resource creation/update. - **`onNewGeneration`**: Handling logic when a new resource generation is detected (update existing vs. recreate). - **`onDeleting`**: Cleanup logic when parent resource is deleting (cascading deletion, finalizer removal). -- **Resource Security**: Reconciliation and restoration of lost/deleted Custom Resources (CRs) to ensure state matches intent (drift detection). +- **Drift/Reconciliation**: Reconciliation and restoration of lost/deleted Custom Resources (CRs) to ensure state matches intent (drift detection).
1431-1440: Clarify scope overlap between error handling and resource-level controls.The "Advanced Error Handling" section (lines 1431-1434) mentions "
onFailureconfiguration per action" and "error recovery workflows", which overlaps conceptually with the "Resource-Level Controls" section (lines 1436-1440) that also describes resource-levelonFailureactions.Recommend clarifying the distinction:
- Advanced Error Handling should focus on workflow-level error recovery (e.g., retry strategies, circuit breakers, explicit recovery actions)
- Resource-Level Controls should focus on per-resource configuration (timeout, retry, onFailure scoping)
Alternatively, merge these into a single "Advanced Error Handling & Resource Controls" section with clear subsections.
1441-1448: Enhance Additional Features descriptions for architectural clarity.The enumerated list of additional features (lines 1441-1448) is concise but lacks brief context on why each is post-MVP rather than MVP. Consider adding brief justifications or implementation notes to help future contributors prioritize these enhancements. For example:
- Rate Limiting: Needed to prevent adapter overload under high-throughput scenarios
- Webhook Support: Enables event-driven patterns beyond polling-based reconciliation
- Advanced Observability: Required for production observability at scale
This also aligns with the architectural detail level throughout the document.
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
xueli181114
force-pushed
the
adapter-future
branch
from
f57c125 to
817dea6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (2)
1419-1424: Reduce repetition in "Advanced Resource Management" bullet points.The first three items all begin with "Resource Management" (e.g.,
onFailure,onNewGeneration,onDeleting), creating unnecessary redundancy. Consider refactoring to a shorter, clearer form.~**Advanced Resource Management:** (HIGH) ~- **`onFailure` Hook**: Configurable behavior when the *workload* represented by the resource fails (e.g., Job pod fails, Deployment crashes) after successful resource creation/update. ~- **`onNewGeneration` Hook**: Handling logic when a new resource generation is detected (update existing vs. recreate). ~- **`onDeleting` Hook**: Cleanup logic when parent resource is deleting (cascading deletion, finalizer removal). ~- **Resource Security**: Reconciliation and restoration of lost/deleted Custom Resources (CRs) to ensure state matches intent (drift detection).
1444-1450: Add concrete DSL syntax examples to Config Template DSL Enhancements section.This section describes features (precondition export,
when/runAfter) but lacks concrete YAML examples. Earlier sections use examples extensively (e.g., lines 257–270, 280–300), so this section would benefit from the same clarity for implementation guidance.Consider adding YAML snippets such as:
- How to access
adapter.preconditions.<conditionName>.matchedin a resource template- Syntax for
whenorrunAfterin resource blocks- Syntax for action dependencies in preconditions/postActions
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md(2 hunks)hyperfleet/components/sentinel/sentinel.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- hyperfleet/components/sentinel/sentinel.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md
[style] ~1423-~1423: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ading deletion, finalizer removal). - Resource Security: Reconciliation and restorat...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (1)
1417-1433: Clarify relationship between MVPonTerminatingand Post-MVPonDeletinglifecycle hooks.The MVP section (line 1410) mentions
onTerminatinghandler for resource deletion, while the Post-MVP section introducesonDeletinghook. Verify whether these represent the same lifecycle point or if they have different semantics (e.g.,onTerminatingfor parent,onDeletingfor resource itself). A brief note or naming alignment would improve clarity.
xueli181114
force-pushed
the
adapter-future
branch
from
817dea6 to
15e66e0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (1)
1420-1423: Refactor repetitive bullet phrasing for clarity.The first three bullets (lines 1420–1422) begin with identical phrasing "Resource Management
on...", reducing readability. Additionally, "Resource Security" (line 1423) appears disconnected from the three management items above and reads more like drift restoration, not security.Consider rewording for clarity and distinction:
~1419~ **Advanced Resource Management:** (HIGH) ~1420~ - `onFailure` Hook: Configurable behavior when the *workload* represented by the resource fails (e.g., Job pod fails, Deployment crashes) after successful resource creation/update. ~1421~ - `onNewGeneration` Hook: Handling logic when a new resource generation is detected (update existing vs. recreate). ~1422~ - `onDeleting` Hook: Cleanup logic when parent resource is deleting (cascading deletion, finalizer removal). ~1423~ - Drift Restoration: Reconciliation and restoration of lost/deleted Custom Resources (CRs) to ensure state matches intent (drift detection).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md(2 hunks)hyperfleet/components/sentinel/sentinel.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md
[style] ~1423-~1423: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ading deletion, finalizer removal). - Resource Security: Reconciliation and restorat...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (1)
1430-1443: Post-MVP Enhancements section is well-organized and appropriately scoped.The expansion of Post-MVP capabilities with prioritized groupings (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) provides clear guidance for phased implementation. The distinction between MVP (global, action-level) and Post-MVP (granular, per-resource) error handling and timeouts is appropriate. Config Template DSL enhancements and Scalability notes align with typical adapter framework evolution.
hyperfleet/components/sentinel/sentinel.md (1)
752-762: Post-MVP Enhancements section appropriately addresses previous feedback.The addition of the Post-MVP Enhancements section with Advanced Alerting features directly resolves the previous review feedback (ciaranRoche's comment about Dead Man's Switch and Queue Lag Monitoring placement). Correctly scoped to Sentinel rather than Adapter, these observability/monitoring features belong with the service that publishes messages rather than consuming them.
The distinction between monitoring message publishing (Sentinel metrics) and message consumption (Adapter metrics) aligns with the suggested approach in the earlier review.
xueli181114
force-pushed
the
adapter-future
branch
from
15e66e0 to
100d96c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (1)
1428-1432: Consider varying the "Resource Management" phrasing for improved readability.The three opening items (lines 1428–1432) all begin with "Resource Management," which creates stylistic repetition. Since this is documentation, consider rephrasing for variety while preserving clarity:
- "Resource Management:
onFailureBehavior" → "onFailureHandling" or "Failure Recovery Logic"- "Resource Management:
onNewGeneration" → "Generation Change Handling"- "Resource Management:
onDeleting" → "Deletion & Cleanup Logic"This maintains the technical precision while improving flow.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md(2 hunks)hyperfleet/components/sentinel/sentinel.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md
[style] ~1432-~1432: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ading deletion, finalizer removal). - Resource Security: Reconciliation and restorat...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
hyperfleet/components/sentinel/sentinel.md (1)
916-924: Well-integrated Post-MVP Enhancements for Sentinel monitoring.The Advanced Alerting additions appropriately align with the decision from prior review feedback to place queue/lag monitoring responsibilities on the Sentinel side (metrics on messages sent, queue lag detection). This complements the adapter-side metrics (messages consumed) for a complete observability picture.
hyperfleet/components/adapter/framework/adapter-frame-design.md (1)
1426-1470: Comprehensive and well-organized Post-MVP enhancements roadmap.The expanded Post-MVP documentation provides clear structure and prioritization (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) across seven enhancement areas. The groupings align well with the adapter framework's design principles (config-driven, stateless, observable). No changes to exported APIs or signatures, as expected.
3 participants
Add some further enhancements areas of adapter
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.