Skip to content

Conversation

@shiftstack-merge-bot
Copy link

No description provided.

When using manila DHSS=true the network needs to be specified to allow
using/creating the share. To allow e2e testing in a DHSS=true env I
added an option to specify network via an environment variable keeping
backward compatibility while allowing testing with DHSS=true

Co-authored-by: eshulman2 <ellashulman1@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 22, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Hi @shiftstack-merge-bot[bot]. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@stephenfin
Copy link

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 22, 2026
* tests: bump devstack to stable/2025.2

* tests: show loadbalancer tags in raw format

---------

Co-authored-by: pýrus <kayrus@users.noreply.github.com>
…etes#3061)

Co-authored-by: pýrus <kayrus@users.noreply.github.com>
@eshulman2
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-openstack

@eshulman2
Copy link
Member

/test security

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 27, 2026

@shiftstack-merge-bot[bot]: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 70f53d4 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stephenfin
Copy link

/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 27, 2026
@stephenfin
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 27, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 27, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: shiftstack-merge-bot[bot], stephenfin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants