Skip to content

[OCPCLOUD-1110] Add e2e tests for managed resources provisioning#17

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
Danil-Grigorev:managed-resources-e2e
Mar 15, 2021
Merged

[OCPCLOUD-1110] Add e2e tests for managed resources provisioning#17
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
Danil-Grigorev:managed-resources-e2e

Conversation

@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Add a test case for provisioning managed resources. Was tested locally on #15, but will later require some changes in the way we configure flags on the deployment. This change although is self sufficient.

@Danil-Grigorev Danil-Grigorev changed the title Add e2e tests for managed resources provisioning [OCPCLOUD-1110] Add e2e tests for managed resources provisioning Feb 22, 2021
@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@Danil-Grigorev
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 2, 2021

@Danil-Grigorev: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade 6bba92a link /test e2e-aws-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

}),
Entry("Should not provision resources for unknown platform", testCase{
status: &configv1.InfrastructureStatus{
Platform: configv1.GCPPlatformType,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why to we use configv1.GCPPlatformType here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ATM GCP is not supported, so it made sense to mark it like this.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ack

Expect(equality.Semantic.DeepDerivative(original, applied)).To(BeTrue())
}
},
Entry("Should provision AWS resources", testCase{
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that the PR is merged, sure

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Fedosin PTAL, OpenStack resources are now included

@Danil-Grigorev Danil-Grigorev force-pushed the managed-resources-e2e branch from f96d3ea to 3aefc6d Compare March 15, 2021 15:50
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 15, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Fedosin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 15, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit af42ea1 into openshift:master Mar 15, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants