Skip to content

OCPCLOUD-2052: Rebase to 1.27#252

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 6 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
odvarkadaniel:rebase-k8s-packages
Jun 6, 2023
Merged

OCPCLOUD-2052: Rebase to 1.27#252
openshift-merge-robot merged 6 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
odvarkadaniel:rebase-k8s-packages

Conversation

@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR rebases the repo to 1.27 k8s packages.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 22, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented May 22, 2023

@odvarkadaniel: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2052 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

This PR rebases the repo to 1.27 k8s packages.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 22, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from JoelSpeed and damdo May 22, 2023 10:07
@odvarkadaniel odvarkadaniel force-pushed the rebase-k8s-packages branch from 0649800 to 155f75d Compare May 22, 2023 10:13
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 22, 2023
@odvarkadaniel odvarkadaniel force-pushed the rebase-k8s-packages branch from 155f75d to d3ef97f Compare May 22, 2023 10:58
Comment thread pkg/controllers/cache.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/controllers/clusteroperator_controller.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/controllers/clusteroperator_controller_test.go Outdated
Comment thread pkg/restmapper/restmapper.go
Comment thread pkg/restmapper/restmapper_test.go Outdated
@odvarkadaniel odvarkadaniel force-pushed the rebase-k8s-packages branch 2 times, most recently from 854f504 to e54809a Compare May 22, 2023 13:44
@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

All the remarks mentioned above are addressed in the latest commit.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Lets see what the tests think


var cfg *rest.Config
var cl client.Client
var ctx = context.Background()
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bonus points for being alphabetically sorted 👍

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 22, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 22, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 22, 2023
@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold

@odvarkadaniel I think there's something that needs investigating here, see the failures in the unit test

There were failures detected in the following suites:
                              azure ./pkg/cloud/azure [Compilation failure]
                            powervs ./pkg/cloud/powervs [Compilation failure]
                        controllers ./pkg/controllers [Compilation failure]
                         azurestack ./pkg/cloud/azurestack [Compilation failure]
                      resourceapply ./pkg/controllers/resourceapply [Compilation failure]
  azure-config-credentials-injector ./cmd/azure-config-credentials-injector [Compilation failure]
                                aws ./pkg/cloud/aws [Compilation failure]
                          openstack ./pkg/cloud/openstack [Suite did not run because the timeout elapsed]
                              cloud ./pkg/cloud [Compilation failure]
                             common ./pkg/cloud/common [Compilation failure]
                         restmapper ./pkg/restmapper [Suite did not run because the timeout elapsed]
                                ibm ./pkg/cloud/ibm [Compilation failure]
                            vsphere ./pkg/cloud/vsphere [Suite did not run because the timeout elapsed]
                             config ./pkg/config [Compilation failure]
                            alibaba ./pkg/cloud/alibaba [Compilation failure]
                            nutanix ./pkg/cloud/nutanix [Compilation failure]
                                gcp ./pkg/cloud/gcp [Compilation failure]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 23, 2023
@odvarkadaniel odvarkadaniel force-pushed the rebase-k8s-packages branch from e54809a to 2729e4f Compare May 23, 2023 12:15
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 23, 2023
@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 30, 2023
@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test unit

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Unit tests timed out after 4 hours, sounds like there's something wrong, can they be run locally from this PR?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 31, 2023
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CCMO is degraded in the E2E tests now, will need further investigation

@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Cluster installs are failing for all providers but aws for some reason. I don't really see why, will look into this tomorrow again.
The issue with unit tests is also pretty random, experienced it a couple of times already while working on PR, though only with CI runs - local runs work fine.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jun 1, 2023
Comment thread cmd/config-sync-controllers/main.go Outdated
@odvarkadaniel odvarkadaniel force-pushed the rebase-k8s-packages branch from 571c106 to 05d2664 Compare June 1, 2023 13:06
Comment thread cmd/config-sync-controllers/main.go Outdated
@odvarkadaniel odvarkadaniel force-pushed the rebase-k8s-packages branch from 05d2664 to 2b5dd4b Compare June 1, 2023 13:17
@odvarkadaniel odvarkadaniel force-pushed the rebase-k8s-packages branch from 2b5dd4b to a3405c5 Compare June 1, 2023 13:18
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

Lets see what the tests think now

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 1, 2023
@odvarkadaniel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jun 1, 2023

@odvarkadaniel: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sunzhaohua2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jun 5, 2023
@dgoodwin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

dgoodwin commented Jun 6, 2023

/label jira/valid-bug

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 6, 2023
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold cancel

Stale hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 6, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9f8abb9 into openshift:master Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants