[release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream … #199

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2019-11-13T20:34:12Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #198

/assign gabemontero

…image import (facilitate disconnected scenarios)

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:34:14Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1771321, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.2.z" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1771321: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:34:14Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1771321, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.2.z" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1771321: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:37:16Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772178, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1771321 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:37:16Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772178, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1771321 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2019-11-13T20:37:24Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:37:27Z

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772178, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1771321 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:37:27Z

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772178, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1771321 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

gabemontero · 2019-11-13T20:38:24Z

/approve

gabemontero · 2019-11-13T20:38:29Z

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:38:37Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [gabemontero]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-13T20:38:37Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [gabemontero]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2019-11-14T09:35:07Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-14T09:47:57Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-14T10:40:13Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-14T11:33:50Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-14T11:44:50Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-14T13:28:54Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2019-11-14T13:43:04Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2019-11-14T14:43:49Z

/hold

still waiting on openshift/origin ruby fix openshift/origin#24109

gabemontero · 2019-11-15T21:36:27Z

/hold cancel

/retest

gabemontero · 2019-11-15T23:29:54Z

/retest

openshift-bot · 2019-11-15T23:54:31Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

gabemontero · 2019-11-18T13:52:12Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-18T13:52:18Z

@gabemontero: An error was encountered adding this pull request to the external tracker bugs for bug 1772178 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

JSONRPC error 100500: DBD::Pg::db do failed: ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "ext_bz_bug_map_bug_id_idx"
DETAIL: Key (bug_id, ext_bz_id, ext_bz_bug_id)=(1772178, 131, /pull/199) already exists. [for Statement "INSERT INTO ext_bz_bug_map (ext_description, ext_bz_id, ext_bz_bug_id, ext_priority, ext_last_updated, bug_id, ext_status) VALUES (?,?,?,?,?,?,?)"]

 at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 754.
	Bugzilla::Object::insert_create_data('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x55d1c9e03a60)') called at /loader/0x55d1d1b15b40/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 118
	Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x55d1d83d9b20)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 858
	Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x55d1d839f960)', 'HASH(0x55d1d8393a68)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21
	Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x55d1d8393a68)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168
	Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x55d1d7b2bc28)') called at /loader/0x55d1d1b15b40/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 80
	Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55d1d7cfca08)') called at (eval 2273) line 1
	eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params) 
;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220
	JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55d1d7f51900)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295
	Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55d1d7f51900)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126
	JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70
	Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31
	ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55d1d7d41540)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
	eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
	ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55d1d7daae78)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173
	ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55d1d7daae78)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32
	ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55d1d7d41540)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139
	Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55d1d7d41540)') called at (eval 2273) line 0
	eval {...} called at (eval 2273) line 0

at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 754.

at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 754.
Bugzilla::Object::insert_create_data('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x55d1c9e03a60)') called at /loader/0x55d1d1b15b40/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/Bug.pm line 118
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug::create('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::Bug', 'HASH(0x55d1d83d9b20)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/extensions/ExternalBugs/Extension.pm line 858
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::bug_start_of_update('Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs=HASH(0x55d1d839f960)', 'HASH(0x55d1d8393a68)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Hook.pm line 21
Bugzilla::Hook::process('bug_start_of_update', 'HASH(0x55d1d8393a68)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168
Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x55d1d7b2bc28)') called at /loader/0x55d1d1b15b40/Bugzilla/Extension/ExternalBugs/WebService.pm line 80
Bugzilla::Extension::ExternalBugs::WebService::add_external_bug('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55d1d7cfca08)') called at (eval 2273) line 1
eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, @params)
;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 220
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55d1d7f51900)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...', 'HASH(0x55d1d7f51900)') called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 126
JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 70
Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::Bugzilla::Extension::E...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/jsonrpc.cgi line 31
ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_jsonrpc_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55d1d7d41540)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55d1d7daae78)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173
ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x55d1d7daae78)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32
ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55d1d7d41540)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139
Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x55d1d7d41540)') called at (eval 2273) line 0
eval {...} called at (eval 2273) line 0

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-18T13:52:18Z

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1772178, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-28T15:17:17Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1772178 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-28T15:17:18Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1772178 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …

3270147

…image import (facilitate disconnected scenarios)

openshift-ci-robot assigned gabemontero Nov 13, 2019

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2019

Bug 1771321: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream … #198

Merged

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 13, 2019

openshift-ci-robot requested review from adambkaplan, dmage and gabemontero November 13, 2019 20:34

gabemontero changed the title ~~[release-4.2] Bug 1771321: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream …~~ [release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream … Nov 13, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 13, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 13, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 14, 2019

openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 15, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 18, 2019

knobunc added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Nov 28, 2019

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4a30c8e into openshift:release-4.2 Nov 28, 2019

[release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream … #199

[release-4.2] Bug 1772178: no longer gate setting progressing to false on in flight imagestream … #199

Uh oh!

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

gabemontero commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

gabemontero commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

gabemontero commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

gabemontero commented Nov 14, 2019

Uh oh!

gabemontero commented Nov 15, 2019

Uh oh!

gabemontero commented Nov 15, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 15, 2019

Uh oh!

gabemontero commented Nov 18, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 18, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 18, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 28, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 28, 2019

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants