OPNET-678: Update openshift/api vendoring

[cybertron]

Specifically looking to pull in the dnsRecordsType field from openshift/api#2460

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A dependency version update for the OpenShift API library in go.mod. The github.com/openshift/api version was bumped from v0.0.0-20251103172241-2e89059c36be to v0.0.0-20251119211055-42e832095c64, representing approximately 16 days of upstream updates. No other modifications were made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Dependency Version Bump go.mod	Updated github.com/openshift/api to a newer version (20251119211055)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3-5 minutes

• Verify that the updated OpenShift API version contains no breaking changes relevant to this project
• Check the commit hash difference between the two versions for any critical updates or fixes

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b581f71 and 3dfb0da.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (14)

• go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/types_infrastructure.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/types_node.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructures-CustomNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructures-DevPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/zz_generated.crd-manifests/0000_10_config-operator_01_infrastructures-TechPreviewNoUpgrade.crd.yaml is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/zz_generated.featuregated-crd-manifests.yaml is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/config/v1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/features/features.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/operator/v1/types_csi_cluster_driver.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/operator/v1/types_ingress.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/operator/v1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/github.com/openshift/api/operator/v1/zz_generated.swagger_doc_generated.go is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**
• vendor/modules.txt is excluded by !vendor/**, !**/vendor/**

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• go.mod (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

• go.mod

🔇 Additional comments (1)

go.mod (1)

13-13: Dependency version updated but stated PR objective not verified in codebase.

The go.mod and go.sum changes are syntactically correct. However, the PR states the objective is to "pull in dnsRecordsType field from upstream openshift/api PR#2460," yet no code in the repository references or uses this field:

• go.sum: ✓ Correctly updated with new version hash
• dnsRecordsType usage: ✗ Zero matches across all Go source files
• Struct definitions: ✗ No type definitions or fields awaiting this type

Clarify whether this PR is:

1. Incomplete—downstream code changes needed to use the new field
2. Forward-looking—intentional without immediate usage
3. Misaligned—dependency updated for reasons other than dnsRecordsType integration

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cybertron
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign davidhurta for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[cybertron]

/retest-required

Infra issue.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@cybertron: This pull request references OPNET-678 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Specifically looking to pull in the dnsRecordsType field from openshift/api#2460

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[cybertron]

/retest-required

API throttling again.

[openshift-ci]

@cybertron: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[cybertron]

Looks like this will be pulled in by #1269 which is already approved.

[cybertron]

The other PR has merged, this is no longer needed.