Skip to content

Bug 2024551: KMS resources not getting created for IBM FlashSystem storage #10506

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2021
Merged

Bug 2024551: KMS resources not getting created for IBM FlashSystem storage #10506

openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2021

Conversation

@SanjalKatiyar
Copy link
Contributor

@SanjalKatiyar SanjalKatiyar commented Nov 18, 2021

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2024551, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (ratamir@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2024551: KMS resources not getting created for IBM FlashSystem storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 18, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from afreen23 and rawagner November 18, 2021 10:33
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin label Nov 18, 2021
afreen23
afreen23 approved these changes Nov 18, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@afreen23 afreen23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 18, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: afreen23, SanjalKatiyar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 18, 2021
@afreen23
Copy link

afreen23 commented Nov 18, 2021 •
edited
Loading

/hold

Tests are broken. Remove hold once #10490 is merged

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 18, 2021
@afreen23
Copy link

afreen23 commented Nov 21, 2021

/hold cancel
/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 21, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 21, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 21, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 21, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 21, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Nov 21, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d0bc890 into openshift:master Nov 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2021

@SanjalKatiyar: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2024551 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2024551: KMS resources not getting created for IBM FlashSystem storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@afreen23
Copy link

afreen23 commented Nov 23, 2021

/cherry-pick release-4.9

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2021
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 23, 2021

@afreen23: new pull request created: #10540

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.10 milestone Dec 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rawagner rawagner Awaiting requested review from rawagner

1 more reviewer

@afreen23 afreen23 afreen23 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@afreen23 afreen23

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/ceph Related to ceph-storage-plugin lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

v4.10

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@SanjalKatiyar @afreen23 @openshift-bot @openshift-cherrypick-robot @spadgett @openshift-merge-robot