Skip to content

Conversation

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett commented Oct 8, 2019

/assign @rhamilto @jwforres
/hold

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.1.z milestone Oct 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@spadgett: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1759667, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.1] Bug 1759667: Add stable-4.2 to channel options

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 8, 2019
@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

spadgett commented Oct 9, 2019

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're still debating the next name to add. It will be one other name.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add fast-4.2 and candidate-4.2, remove prerelease-4.2.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ordering wise, will stable show up at top, then fast, then candidate?

@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

@smarterclayton updated

Cluster Settings · OKD 2019-10-10 12-59-22

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

See my order comment

@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

I updated the ordering:

Cluster Settings · OKD 2019-10-10 13-16-09

@smarterclayton smarterclayton changed the title [release-4.1] Bug 1759667: Add stable-4.2 to channel options Bug 1759667: Add stable-4.2 to channel options Oct 10, 2019
@smarterclayton smarterclayton changed the title Bug 1759667: Add stable-4.2 to channel options Bug 1759667: Add the official 4.2 channels to cluster upgrade settings Oct 10, 2019
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 10, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@cuppett
Copy link
Member

cuppett commented Oct 10, 2019

/retest e2e-aws

@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@cuppett
Copy link
Member

cuppett commented Oct 10, 2019

/test e2e-aws

@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

/retest
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 10, 2019
@mrunalp mrunalp added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 10, 2019
@spadgett
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit af5dbee into openshift:release-4.1 Oct 10, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@spadgett: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1759667 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1759667: Add the official 4.2 channels to cluster upgrade settings

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett deleted the stable-4.2-channel branch October 10, 2019 21:24
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-api that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2019
This commit adds the ability to store release metadata, for example
the list of channels that a release is in:

  $ curl -sH 'Accept:application/json' 'https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph?channel=stable-4.2' | jq -r '.nodes[] | select(.version == "4.2.4").metadata["io.openshift.upgrades.graph.release.channels"] | split(",")[]'
  candidate-4.2
  fast-4.2
  stable-4.2

That will allow the console and other downstream tooling to expose a
list of channels available to a given cluster right now, instead of
hard-coding an expected list [1].  This will account for things like
phased releases, where we may not recommend an upgrade for your
particular stable-4.2 cluster even though we are recommending the
upgrade for other stable-4.2 clusters.

Pivoting around this retyping in Go will require consumer bumps, but I
don't think it's a breaking change because the only YAML removal is
'force', which is meaningless in AvailableUpdates.  So I don't think
this needs to count as a backwards-compat-breaking schema bump.

Autogenerated bumps via:

  $ hack/update-swagger-docs.sh
  $ make update-codegen-crds

[1]: openshift/console#2935
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-api that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2019
This commit adds the ability to store release metadata, for example
the list of channels that a release is in:

  $ curl -sH 'Accept:application/json' 'https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph?channel=stable-4.2' | jq -r '.nodes[] | select(.version == "4.2.4").metadata["io.openshift.upgrades.graph.release.channels"] | split(",")[]'
  candidate-4.2
  fast-4.2
  stable-4.2

That will allow the console and other downstream tooling to expose a
list of channels available to a given cluster right now, instead of
hard-coding an expected list [1].  This will account for things like
phased releases, where we may not recommend an upgrade for your
particular stable-4.2 cluster even though we are recommending the
upgrade for other stable-4.2 clusters.

Pivoting around this retyping in Go will require consumer bumps, but I
don't think it's a breaking change because the only YAML removal is
'force', which is meaningless in AvailableUpdates.  So I don't think
this needs to count as a backwards-compat-breaking schema bump.

Autogenerated bumps via:

  $ unset GOBIN  # vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/generate-groups.sh and such require "${GOPATH}/bin/deepcopy-gen"
  $ go get k8s.io/gengo/examples/deepcopy-gen
  $ hack/update-deepcopy.sh
  $ hack/update-swagger-docs.sh
  $ make update-codegen-crds

[1]: openshift/console#2935
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-api that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2019
This commit adds the ability to store release metadata, for example
the list of channels that a release is in:

  $ curl -sH 'Accept:application/json' 'https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph?channel=stable-4.2' | jq -r '.nodes[] | select(.version == "4.2.4").metadata["io.openshift.upgrades.graph.release.channels"] | split(",")[]'
  candidate-4.2
  fast-4.2
  stable-4.2

That will allow the console and other downstream tooling to expose a
list of channels available to a given cluster right now, instead of
hard-coding an expected list [1].  This will account for things like
phased releases, where we may not recommend an upgrade for your
particular stable-4.2 cluster even though we are recommending the
upgrade for other stable-4.2 clusters.

Pivoting around this retyping in Go will require consumer bumps, but I
don't think it's a breaking change because the only YAML removal is
'force', which is meaningless in AvailableUpdates.  So I don't think
this needs to count as a backwards-compat-breaking schema bump.

Autogenerated bumps via:

  $ unset GOBIN  # vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/generate-groups.sh and such require "${GOPATH}/bin/deepcopy-gen"
  $ go get k8s.io/gengo/examples/deepcopy-gen
  $ hack/update-deepcopy.sh
  $ hack/update-swagger-docs.sh
  $ make update-codegen-crds

[1]: openshift/console#2935
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-api that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2020
This commit adds the ability to store release metadata, for example
the list of channels that a release is in:

  $ curl -sH 'Accept:application/json' 'https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph?channel=stable-4.2' | jq -r '.nodes[] | select(.version == "4.2.4").metadata["io.openshift.upgrades.graph.release.channels"] | split(",")[]'
  candidate-4.2
  fast-4.2
  stable-4.2

That will allow the console and other downstream tooling to expose a
list of channels available to a given cluster right now, instead of
hard-coding an expected list [1].  This will account for things like
phased releases, where we may not recommend an upgrade for your
particular stable-4.2 cluster even though we are recommending the
upgrade for other stable-4.2 clusters.

Pivoting around this retyping in Go will require consumer bumps, but I
don't think it's a breaking change because the only YAML removal is
'force', which is meaningless in AvailableUpdates.  So I don't think
this needs to count as a backwards-compat-breaking schema bump.

Autogenerated bumps via:

  $ unset GOBIN  # vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/generate-groups.sh and such require "${GOPATH}/bin/deepcopy-gen"
  $ go get k8s.io/gengo/examples/deepcopy-gen
  $ hack/update-deepcopy.sh
  $ hack/update-swagger-docs.sh
  $ make update-codegen-crds

[1]: openshift/console#2935
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-api that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
This commit adds the ability to store release metadata, implementing
openshift/enhancements@2eb16cf80d
(enhancements/update/available-update-metadata: Propose a new
enhancement, 2020-07-20, openshift/enhancements#123).  For example the
list of channels that a release is in:

  $ curl -sH 'Accept:application/json' 'https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph?channel=stable-4.2' | jq -r '.nodes[] | select(.version == "4.2.4").metadata["io.openshift.upgrades.graph.release.channels"] | split(",")[]'
  candidate-4.2
  fast-4.2
  stable-4.2

That will allow the console and other downstream tooling to expose a
list of channels available to a given cluster right now, instead of
hard-coding an expected list [1].  This will account for things like
phased releases, where we may not recommend an upgrade for your
particular stable-4.2 cluster even though we are recommending the
upgrade for other stable-4.2 clusters.

Pivoting around this retyping in Go will require consumer bumps, but I
don't think it's a breaking change because the only YAML removal is
'force', which is meaningless in AvailableUpdates.  So I don't think
this needs to count as a backwards-compat-breaking schema bump.

Autogenerated bumps via:

  $ unset GOBIN  # vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/generate-groups.sh and such require "${GOPATH}/bin/deepcopy-gen"
  $ go get k8s.io/gengo/examples/deepcopy-gen
  $ hack/update-deepcopy.sh
  $ hack/update-swagger-docs.sh
  $ make update-codegen-crds

[1]: openshift/console#2935
wking added a commit to wking/openshift-api that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2020
This commit adds the ability to store release metadata, implementing
openshift/enhancements@2eb16cf80d
(enhancements/update/available-update-metadata: Propose a new
enhancement, 2020-07-20, openshift/enhancements#123) as adjusted by
openshift/enhancements@12eff48079
(enhancements/update/available-update-metadata: 'url' docstring
context, 2020-07-21, openshift/enhancements#408).  For example the
list of channels that a release is in:

  $ curl -sH 'Accept:application/json' 'https://api.openshift.com/api/upgrades_info/v1/graph?channel=stable-4.2' | jq -r '.nodes[] | select(.version == "4.2.4").metadata["io.openshift.upgrades.graph.release.channels"] | split(",")[]'
  candidate-4.2
  fast-4.2
  stable-4.2

That will allow the console and other downstream tooling to expose a
list of channels available to a given cluster right now, instead of
hard-coding an expected list [1].  This will account for things like
phased releases, where we may not recommend an upgrade for your
particular stable-4.2 cluster even though we are recommending the
upgrade for other stable-4.2 clusters.

Pivoting around this retyping in Go will require consumer bumps, but I
don't think it's a breaking change because the only YAML removal is
'force', which is meaningless in AvailableUpdates.  So I don't think
this needs to count as a backwards-compat-breaking schema bump.

Autogenerated bumps via:

  $ unset GOBIN  # vendor/k8s.io/code-generator/generate-groups.sh and such require "${GOPATH}/bin/deepcopy-gen"
  $ go get k8s.io/gengo/examples/deepcopy-gen
  $ hack/update-deepcopy.sh
  $ hack/update-swagger-docs.sh
  $ make update-codegen-crds

[1]: openshift/console#2935
meysam-jeffrey pushed a commit to snapp-incubator/console that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2025
Bug 1759667: Add the official 4.2 channels to cluster upgrade settings
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants