-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 667
Bug 1773787: Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers [release-4.2] #3685
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
- add bash script to test a sample of good ciphers & bad ciphers
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1777129, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1773787, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
spadgett
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
/lgtm
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@spadgett @benjaminapetersen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773787 does not have an upstream 4.3 and 4.4 BZ. was this issue not applicable to those releases? |
|
/bugzilla refresh (4.3 BZ is not in verfied, so this is going to go back to invalid-BZ state) |
|
@bparees: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1773787, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/lgtm cancel |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1773787, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/hold. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1773787. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #3389
/assign spadgett