Skip to content

Conversation

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member

…sterAutoscalar CRD exists

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 28, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhamilto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920655, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.7.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1920655: only show Cluster autoscalar on Cluster Settings if Clu…

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the component/core Related to console core functionality label Jan 28, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/shared Related to console-shared labels Jan 28, 2021
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 28, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhamilto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1920655, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@dtaylor113 dtaylor113 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 28, 2021
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @rhamilto 👍

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 28, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

@csrwng FYI

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 28, 2021
@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

Updated. Please take another look, @spadgett

@rhamilto rhamilto force-pushed the bz1920655 branch 4 times, most recently from 473076e to 10bef8b Compare January 28, 2021 22:41
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 29, 2021
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just one nit. Thanks @rhamilto

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd pull useFlag onto its own line outside the if since hooks always need to run in the same order every render. It's not a problem now since the if will always evaluate, but if someone added another condition later like isOpenShift && useFlag(FLAGS.CLUSTER_AUTOSCALER), it could break things. It's a good practice to have hooks on their own near the top of the function.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LOL. I had it on its own line and then optimized. That'll learn me.

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

Comment addressed. Thanks, @spadgett.

Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

👍

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dtaylor113, rhamilto, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@rhamilto
Copy link
Member Author

rhamilto commented Jan 29, 2021

/hold for openshift/release#15363

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 29, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 29, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/ceph-storage-plugin

The test should only run on PRs with ceph changes. A bad config change caused the failure.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@spadgett: Overrode contexts on behalf of spadgett: ci/prow/ceph-storage-plugin

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/ceph-storage-plugin

The test should only run on PRs with ceph changes. A bad config change caused the failure.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f79f7da into openshift:master Jan 29, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rhamilto: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1920655 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1920655: only show Cluster autoscalar on Cluster Settings if Clu…

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rhamilto rhamilto deleted the bz1920655 branch February 1, 2021 13:21
@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.7 milestone Feb 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. component/core Related to console core functionality component/shared Related to console-shared lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants