Skip to content

Conversation

@jeff-phillips-18
Copy link
Member

@jeff-phillips-18 jeff-phillips-18 commented Mar 1, 2021

Fixes:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ODC-5563

Analysis / Root cause:
kubernetes/enhancements#1164 removed the selfLink attribute. This attribute was being used to determine the managed by resource for the operator group.

Solution Description:
Remove the dependency on selfLink by passing back the name of the CSV and keeping this name as part of the data for the operator backed service group node.

Browser conformance:

  • Chrome
  • Firefox
  • Safari
  • Edge

/kind bug

@jeff-phillips-18
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-4.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeff-phillips-18: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.7 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jeff-phillips-18 jeff-phillips-18 added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Mar 1, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@rottencandy rottencandy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2021
@rottencandy
Copy link
Contributor

@jeff-phillips-18 looks like changing getOperatorGroupResources has broken some test cases.

@jeff-phillips-18
Copy link
Member Author

@jeff-phillips-18 looks like changing getOperatorGroupResources has broken some test cases.

Thanks. Fixing.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2021
@jeff-phillips-18
Copy link
Member Author

@jeff-phillips-18 looks like changing getOperatorGroupResources has broken some test cases.

Fixed. Thanks.

@invincibleJai
Copy link
Member

/approve

Verified the changes , works as expected

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 1, 2021
@christianvogt
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: christianvogt, invincibleJai, jeff-phillips-18, rottencandy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@invincibleJai
Copy link
Member

/test all

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

11 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Mar 3, 2021

Holding until #8289 merges to unblock CI.

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 3, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

spadgett commented Mar 5, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 5, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit faa6210 into openshift:master Mar 6, 2021
@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jeff-phillips-18: new pull request created: #8317

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jeff-phillips-18 jeff-phillips-18 changed the title Fix topology crash due to selfLink deprecation Bug 1937077: Fix topology crash due to selfLink deprecation Mar 9, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jeff-phillips-18: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1937077 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1937077: Fix topology crash due to selfLink deprecation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@spadgett spadgett added this to the v4.8 milestone Mar 18, 2021
@jeff-phillips-18 jeff-phillips-18 deleted the label-crash branch January 4, 2023 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. component/topology Related to topology kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants