Skip to content

BUILD-365: Rename shared resource csi driver operand#64

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
coreydaley:rename_operand
Oct 25, 2021
Merged

BUILD-365: Rename shared resource csi driver operand#64
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
coreydaley:rename_operand

Conversation

@coreydaley
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from adambkaplan and otaviof October 25, 2021 14:20
@coreydaley coreydaley changed the title Rename shared resource csi driver operand BUILD-365: Rename shared resource csi driver operand Oct 25, 2021
@coreydaley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/assign @gabemontero

@gabemontero
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/hold
/approve
/lgtm

@coreydaley - please inspect the mustgather and confirm our daemonset / pods in fact have the correct name, and that if you look at their pod logs, there are no glaring errors

yes, I understand the wait for daemonset stuff would not pass without it, but given the unexpected roadblocks we've hit with this stuff, lets make sure there isn't a surprise waiting for us

for example, am I correct in thinking that the operator still would have created items with the old csi-hostpath name until your operator PR merges? I think I may be ... in which case, maybe the tests are passing cause the old daemonset is still there, etc.

given this in between state, let's see if we can catch any boo boo's before you move back to your operator PR

but if the logs look OK, cancel the hold and we'll go from there

thanks

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Oct 25, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 25, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: coreydaley, gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 25, 2021
@gabemontero
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

NOTE to any readers here - we are doing this rename at the behest of the storage team (who asked in slack)

@coreydaley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@gabemontero
The operator test was failing because it was running the tests from this repository, which were looking for the old name, even though the new name was being used.

I have manually confirmed via the must-gather that the pods have the new shared-resource-csi-driver-node name and that the logs do not show any weird errors.

You can verify here (https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_csi-driver-shared-resource-operator/14/pull-ci-openshift-csi-driver-shared-resource-operator-master-e2e-aws-csi-driver/1452638647856664576) that the tests failed while looking for the csi-hostpathplugin daemonset in the tests from the csi-driver-shared-resource repository.
If there is anything that you can think of that you would like me to verify, let me know!

@coreydaley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 25, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 91f281c into openshift:master Oct 25, 2021
@gabemontero
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gabemontero The operator test was failing because it was running the tests from this repository, which were looking for the old name, even though the new name was being used.

I have manually confirmed via the must-gather that the pods have the new shared-resource-csi-driver-node name and that the logs do not show any weird errors.

You can verify here (https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_csi-driver-shared-resource-operator/14/pull-ci-openshift-csi-driver-shared-resource-operator-master-e2e-aws-csi-driver/1452638647856664576) that the tests failed while looking for the csi-hostpathplugin daemonset in the tests from the csi-driver-shared-resource repository. If there is anything that you can think of that you would like me to verify, let me know!

Not sure why you linked to you operator PRs tests ... I was curious about the must gather from this PRs e2es.

Looking at https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_csi-driver-shared-resource/64/pull-ci-openshift-csi-driver-shared-resource-master-e2e-aws-csi-driver/1452690547113201664

and its must gather, I only see the new name on the pod list

but duh, since this is still testing on a normal cluster (vs. a tech preview cluster), which needs my Jira :-/ ... that is in fact expected, as the operator will not have done anything on a non-tech preview cluster

let's move on to openshift/csi-driver-shared-resource-operator#14 which should be doing CI now in a tech preview cluster, given openshift/release#22927 has merged, and see what happens

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants