HIVE-2819: Use annotation instead of label for upgradeable#2650
Conversation
|
Colon-delim for the Jira-linking bots: /retitle HIVE-2819: Use annotation instead of label for upgradeable |
|
@AlexVulaj: This pull request references HIVE-2819 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
wking
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
/lgtm
Any way we can test this new iteration vs. a 4.15 cluster (or other cluster that will exercise this logic) pre-merge?
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: 2uasimojo, AlexVulaj, wking The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Oh, yeah, I did say I would build and deploy this first. /hold |
|
@AlexVulaj: This pull request references HIVE-2819 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/hold cancel |
|
@AlexVulaj: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2650 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 50.14% 50.14%
=======================================
Files 281 281
Lines 33298 33300 +2
=======================================
+ Hits 16696 16698 +2
Misses 15261 15261
Partials 1341 1341
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This is a follow up to #2639 , but moving the value to the cluster deployment annotations instead of labels. This change is due to an issue found with certain allowed characters for labels that do not affect annotations.
For example, the following error was seen testing the labels from the previous PR: