Skip to content

Conversation

@serbrech
Copy link
Contributor

@serbrech serbrech commented Mar 26, 2019

This PR is being split into smaller chunks and should not be merged.

Basic implementation of the platform specific code in the installer to enable Azure as a target platform.

It is bypassing the MachineSpecProvider until we have it ready.
There are a few shortcuts, but it allows to run the installer, generate all the assets and the tfvars needed for the terraform PR (#1454) to deploy a cluster on Azure.

The aim for this PR is to get a minimum working solution to be able to iterate in smaller subsequent PRs.

TODO :

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Mar 26, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @serbrech. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 26, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: serbrech
To fully approve this pull request, please assign additional approvers.
We suggest the following additional approver: russellb

If they are not already assigned, you can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @russellb in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@serbrech
Copy link
Contributor Author

@enxebre
Copy link
Member

enxebre commented Mar 26, 2019

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Mar 26, 2019
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need this yet? Is go I can't find the Gopkg.* changes

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it was initially faked by adding a dummy implementation in the vendor.
it's dirty, but we can soon remove it.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 28, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Mar 28, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you need this change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

allows to get the platform name without depending on more assets

😕 do you mind expanding on that?
in the current usage, why not call platform.Name() directly compared to CurrentPlatformName ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that gives returns the name of the asset. not the name of the platform.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: this might not be required.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

azure doesn't support / in tags, and I don't know what these tags are used for in openshift.
to get the terraform deployment to work, I changed the / with a ..
if the `kubernetes/io/cluster' tags are not needed for openshift, I'm happy to remove them

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 30, 2019
@serbrech serbrech changed the title feat: Basic implementation enabling azure platform [WIP] feat: Basic implementation enabling azure platform Apr 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Apr 8, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@serbrech: PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@serbrech: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/gofmt a14f996 link /test gofmt
ci/prow/images a14f996 link /test images
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade a14f996 link /test e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/verify-vendor a14f996 link /test verify-vendor
ci/prow/e2e-aws a14f996 link /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

this was replaced with multiple PRs
like #1721 #1454 etc.

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@abhinavdahiya: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

this was replaced with multiple PRs
like #1721 #1454 etc.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants