Bug 1734539: Openstack: Option to set multiple external DNS IP Addresses#2132
Conversation
f79d659 to
59cd73a
Compare
|
/test e2e-aws |
|
/test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't external_dns be the preferred resolver if it is set?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
var.external_dns should be moved outside of the array.
c5191e4 to
815cd25
Compare
|
Dependant on #1959 |
|
/hold The OpenStack CI is non-voting so I'm putting a hold on this so we don't accidentally merge it before #1959. The change itself looks good to me. |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
db424be to
7ee6972
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: This comment as well as the comments for the rest of the fields except DefaultMachinePlatform is not following the best practice. It should be a complete sentence--rather than having the field name on its own line--and end with a period. Following this convention allows automatic generation of documentation using doc command.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I can open a seperate PR to address this, if thats ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: this function signature is getting ridiculously long. this is not a problem with your pr and you don't need to fix it. it is probably like this in many packages other than openstack but I just wanted to take this opportunity to point that out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
agreed, It actually is more a problem with our platform than others. I'm going to make an action item to align more with how aws calls this function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it can also be helpful to have a valid test case.
|
code looks good to me. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve would like to see @patrickdillon 2 comments addressed. but if you think those can be done as follow-up feel free to lift the hold. /hold |
|
I will address the comments that do not follow best practice in another pull request. All components related to this feature have been updated to match best practices. will cancel hold after unit tests pass |
|
/hold cancel |
|
/lgtm @iamemilio please make the requested changes in a follow-up patch. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, iamemilio, mandre, patrickdillon, tomassedovic The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@iamemilio: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1734539 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@iamemilio: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Hi guys, |
Adds an option in the installer that allows users to add the ip addresses of dns servers. These IP's will be added to the nodes subnet.
Bug Fix for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734539