Skip to content

Bug 1982001: bump RHCOS boot images for 4.8#5171

Closed
miabbott wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.8from
miabbott:bz1982001
Closed

Bug 1982001: bump RHCOS boot images for 4.8#5171
miabbott wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.8from
miabbott:bz1982001

Conversation

@miabbott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@miabbott miabbott commented Aug 26, 2021

This updates the RHCOS boot image metadata in the installer with the
most recent version of RHCOS 4.8 artifacts.

This includes fixes for the following BZs:

1982002 [4.8.z] On a Azure IPI installation MCO fails to create new nodes
1983773 [4.8] coreos-installer fails to download Ignition (DNS error, failed to lookup address)
1984086 [4.8] Installation with multipath parameters in parmfile fails (DNS resolution missing)

Changes generated with the following:

$ plume cosa2stream --url https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases --target data/data/rhcos-stream.json --distro rhcos aarch64=48.84.202106171757-0 ppc64le=48.84.202108210803-0 s390x=48.84.202108210504-0 x86-64=48.84.2021082[coreos-assembler]$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-aarch64/48.84.202106171757-0/aarch64/meta.json aarch64
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-aarch64/48.84.202106171757-0/aarch64/meta.json aarch64
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-ppc64le/48.84.202108210803-0/ppc64le/meta.json ppc64le
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-s390x/48.84.202108210504-0/s390x/meta.json s390x
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8/48.84.202108210854-0/x86_64/meta.json amd64

@miabbott
Bug 1982001: bump RHCOS boot images for 4.8
9652287 
This updates the RHCOS boot image metadata in the installer with the
most recent version of RHCOS 4.8 artifacts.

This includes fixes for the following BZs:

1982002 [4.8.z] On a Azure IPI installation MCO fails to create new nodes
1983773 [4.8] coreos-installer fails to download Ignition (DNS error, failed to lookup address)
1984086 [4.8] Installation with multipath parameters in parmfile fails (DNS resolution missing)

Changes generated with the following:

```
$ plume cosa2stream --url https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases --target data/data/rhcos-stream.json --distro rhcos aarch64=48.84.202106171757-0 ppc64le=48.84.202108210803-0 s390x=48.84.202108210504-0 x86-64=48.84.2021082[coreos-assembler]$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-aarch64/48.84.202106171757-0/aarch64/meta.json aarch64
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-aarch64/48.84.202106171757-0/aarch64/meta.json aarch64
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-ppc64le/48.84.202108210803-0/ppc64le/meta.json ppc64le
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8-s390x/48.84.202108210504-0/s390x/meta.json s390x
$ hack/update-rhcos-bootimage.py https://rhcos-redirector.apps.art.xq1c.p1.openshiftapps.com/art/storage/releases/rhcos-4.8/48.84.202108210854-0/x86_64/meta.json amd64
```
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 26, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 26, 2021

@miabbott: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982001, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1981999 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1982001: bump RHCOS boot images for 4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 26, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from e-tienne and rna-afk August 26, 2021 12:54
@miabbott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

miabbott commented Aug 26, 2021

/test e2e-vsphere
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-azure

e-tienne
e-tienne reviewed Aug 26, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@e-tienne e-tienne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 26, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 27, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 27, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982001, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1981999 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 28, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 28, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982001, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1981999 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 29, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 29, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982001, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1981999 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 30, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 30, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982001, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1981999 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 31, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 31, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 31, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982001, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1981999 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1981999 targets the "4.9.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mike-nguyen

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 31, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from mike-nguyen August 31, 2021 01:01
@miabbott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

miabbott commented Aug 31, 2021

/retest

@miabbott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

miabbott commented Aug 31, 2021

/assign @jlebon @bgilbert @sdodson

@sdodson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

sdodson commented Aug 31, 2021

/test e2e-vsphere
/test e2e-metal

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 31, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@miabbott: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 9652287 link /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-crc 9652287 link /test e2e-crc

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 1, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 1, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

22 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@miabbott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

miabbott commented Sep 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

/hold

The previous 4.9 bump is getting reverted, which undoes the fixes to the dependent BZs in 4.9. See #5180

We'll need to land another 4.9 boot image bump successfully before we can correctly land this 4.8 bump.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 2, 2021
@miabbott
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

miabbott commented Sep 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

We've decided to close the PR instead of holding it.

@miabbott miabbott closed this Sep 2, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 2, 2021

@miabbott: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1982001. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1982001: bump RHCOS boot images for 4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@rna-afk rna-afk Awaiting requested review from rna-afk

@mike-nguyen mike-nguyen Awaiting requested review from mike-nguyen

1 more reviewer

@e-tienne e-tienne e-tienne left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@sdodson sdodson

@bgilbert bgilbert

@jlebon jlebon

@e-tienne e-tienne

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@miabbott @openshift-bot @sdodson @e-tienne @bgilbert @jlebon