Bug 1965545: vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix

[kolyshkin]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

/kind regression

What this PR does / why we need it:

This updates runc/libcontainer vendoring to include the fix from from openshift/opencontainers-runc#9 (which in turn is a backport from opencontainers/runc#2997).

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965545

Special notes for your reviewer:

Fix the "Pod stuck in ContainerCreating: Unit ...slice already exists" regression

[openshift-ci]

@kolyshkin: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci]

@kolyshkin: The label(s) kind/regression cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

Details

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

/kind regression

What this PR does / why we need it:

This updates runc/libcontainer vendoring to include the fix from from openshift/opencontainers-runc#9 (which in turn is a backport from opencontainers/runc#2997).

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965545

Special notes for your reviewer:

Fix the "Pod stuck in ContainerCreating: Unit ...slice already exists" regression

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@kolyshkin: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• ea29f32|vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

[openshift-ci]

@kolyshkin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1965545, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
• expected Bugzilla bug 1965545 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1965545: vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[nee1esh]

/bugzilla refresh

[openshift-ci]

@nee1esh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1965545, which is invalid:

• expected Bugzilla bug 1965545 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[nee1esh]

/retest

[openshift-ci-robot]

@kolyshkin: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 138bc93|UPSTREAM: : vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

[kolyshkin]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

@kolyshkin: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1965545, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.8.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.0)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (schoudha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1965545: vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[deads2k]

need to make this an UPSTREAM: commit. We will drop this commit in 4.9 when updating to 1.22

[openshift-ci-robot]

@kolyshkin: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 3b7f326|UPSTREAM: : vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

[deads2k]

This is ok if the node team acks it.

/approve
/assign @mrunalp

[mrunalp]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, kolyshkin, mrunalp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS [deads2k]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mrunalp]

/retest

[kolyshkin]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

@kolyshkin: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test e2e-metal-ipi
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test e2e-aws-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-aws-downgrade	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test e2e-aws-downgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/configmap-scale	138bc93c1efd3abba9c9ac28ac79502beaa99770	link	/test configmap-scale

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[openshift-ci]

@kolyshkin: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/kubernetes#790

Bugzilla bug 1965545 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1965545: vendor: bump runc to rc95 + "unit exists" fix

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.