Detect unused test-annotating rules#830
Conversation
|
@danwinship: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated. The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@danwinship: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
|
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
|
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue by commenting /close |
|
@openshift-bot: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I was trying to figure out if any of the current networking-related test annotations were out of date and ended up doing this. FTR:
(note that in some cases, like a lot of the sig-node tests, the pattern is unused because the test got correctly annotated upstream (and so the rule is no longer necessary) not because the test got deleted/renamed)