Skip to content

[release-4.4] Bug 1869962: Add template for recycler pod#2004

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.4from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-1687-to-release-4.4
Aug 24, 2020
Merged

[release-4.4] Bug 1869962: Add template for recycler pod#2004
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.4from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-1687-to-release-4.4

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Aug 13, 2020

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1687

/assign bertinatto

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2020
Merged
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 13, 2020

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1805908 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1868624. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1805908: Add template for recycler pod

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1805908: Add template for recycler pod [release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod Aug 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 13, 2020

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868624, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1805908 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 13, 2020

/retitle [release-4.4] Bug 1868625: Add template for recycler pod

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod [release-4.4] Bug 1868625: Add template for recycler pod Aug 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 13, 2020

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868625, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1868615 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1805908 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1868625: Add template for recycler pod

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kikisdeliveryservice commented Aug 13, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 13, 2020

@kikisdeliveryservice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868625, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1868615 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1805908 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kikisdeliveryservice commented Aug 13, 2020

/retest

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kikisdeliveryservice commented Aug 14, 2020

@bertinatto you'll have to fix the underlying BZs on this: #2004 (comment)

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kikisdeliveryservice commented Aug 18, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 18, 2020

@kikisdeliveryservice: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868625, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to be open, but it isn't
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is CLOSED (DUPLICATE) instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1868615 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1805908 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

kikisdeliveryservice commented Aug 18, 2020

@bertinatto can you check the attached BZ and fix as necessary?

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 19, 2020

/retitle [release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1868625: Add template for recycler pod [release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod Aug 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 19, 2020

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1868624, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1805908 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 19, 2020

/retitle [release-4.4] Bug 1869962: Add template for recycler pod

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1868624: Add template for recycler pod [release-4.4] Bug 1869962: Add template for recycler pod Aug 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 19, 2020

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1869962, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1868615 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1805908 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1869962: Add template for recycler pod

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 19, 2020

@bertinatto can you check the attached BZ and fix as necessary?

@kikisdeliveryservice Waiting for openshift/cluster-kube-controller-manager-operator#433 to get merged so that dependent bug (1868615) is fixed. Then I'll be able to fix this one (IIUC).

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 20, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 20, 2020

@bertinatto: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1869962, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1805908 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 20, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 21, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 21, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 22, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 23, 2020

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Aug 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2775e04 into openshift:release-4.4 Aug 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 24, 2020

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/machine-config-operator#2004. Bugzilla bug 1869962 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1869962: Add template for recycler pod

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bertinatto commented Aug 26, 2020

/cherry-pick release-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Aug 26, 2020
Closed
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Aug 26, 2020

@bertinatto: new pull request created: #2026

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sinnykumari sinnykumari sinnykumari approved these changes

@ericavonb ericavonb Awaiting requested review from ericavonb

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice Awaiting requested review from kikisdeliveryservice

Assignees

@bertinatto bertinatto

@jsafrane jsafrane

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants

@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @bertinatto @kikisdeliveryservice @jsafrane @openshift-bot @sinnykumari @jwforres @openshift-merge-robot