[release-4.14]OCPBUGS-27178: use *resource.Quantity to not automatically set 0#4121
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
@QiWang19: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27178, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Signed-off-by: Qi Wang <qiwan@redhat.com>
7d3fa43 to
d26c41f
Compare
|
/cherry-pick release-4.13 |
|
@QiWang19: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.13 in a new PR and assign it to you. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest |
|
@QiWang19: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27178, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@yuqi-zhang @lyman9966 PTAL |
yuqi-zhang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I guess this is kind of a weird case where we're changing the API in different places based on the version.
I'm fine with this offhand since it should be a safe change anyways. It doesn't map as well from a backport perspective to a singular PR but so long as it's not breaking anything I think we should be good?
|
/label qe-approved test passed: |
|
/lgtm |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: QiWang19, rphillips, yuqi-zhang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
@QiWang19: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@QiWang19: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27178: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-27178 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@QiWang19: #4121 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.13": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build openshift-proxy-pull-test-container-v4.14.0-202401231409.p0.ga4b8a7c.assembly.stream for distgit openshift-proxy-pull-test. |
Backport API fix openshift/api#1656
- What I did
Change the type of OverlaySize and LogSizeMax resource.Quantity to pointer *resource.Quantity.
the struct type will be set as 0 automatically when retrieving the ctrcfg object.
- How to verify it
- Description for the changelog