Skip to content

Conversation

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor

@damemi damemi commented Jul 10, 2020

(This is in progress, most of these repos don't have the rc tag created yet)

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 10, 2020
@damemi damemi force-pushed the rebase-1.19 branch 2 times, most recently from 97226fa to a04315a Compare July 14, 2020 21:31
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 16, 2020
@damemi damemi force-pushed the rebase-1.19 branch 2 times, most recently from 385f62b to 0f436fe Compare July 23, 2020 15:36
@damemi damemi changed the title [wip] 1.19 rebase Bump to k8s 1.19-rc.1 Jul 23, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 23, 2020
go.mod Outdated
github.com/openshift/api => github.com/openshift/api prebase-1.19-rc.1
github.com/openshift/client-go => github.com/openshift/client-go prebase-1.19-rc.1
github.com/openshift/library-go => github.com/openshift/library-go prebase-1.19-rc.1
github.com/openshift/apiserver-library-go => github.com/damemi/apiserver-library-go prebase-1.19-rc.1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn't find a merged rc.1 branch (only one for rc.2: openshift/apiserver-library-go#31), so note that I forked it and re-did the rc2 bump with an rc1 bump. There was only 1 other commit so for a prebase I think this is ok

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 23, 2020
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Jul 23, 2020

@soltysh this is squashed to a point I'm comfortable with, if it passes CI it's ready to merge

@damemi damemi force-pushed the rebase-1.19 branch 2 times, most recently from 046539b to cec32b9 Compare July 23, 2020 17:18
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Jul 23, 2020

/retest

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Jul 23, 2020

I'm thinking the unit test failures are infra flakes? Seeing a bunch of them in recent runs that look like registry/image problems:

projectstatus_test.go:548: a/b test DeploymentConfig: did not have "sinatra-app-example-b deploys":
            In project example on server https://example.com:8443
            
            svc/sinatra-app-example - 172.30.17.49:8080
            
            bc/sinatra-app-example source builds git://github.com/mfojtik/sinatra-app-example on docker.io/centos/ruby-25-centos7:latest
              -> istag/sinatra-app-example:latest
              build #1 running for about a minute - 7a4f354: Prepare v1 Template types (Roy Programmer <someguy@outhere.com>) (can't push to image)
            
            Errors:
              * bc/sinatra-app-example is pushing to istag/sinatra-app-example:latest, but the administrator has not configured the integrated container image registry.
                try: oc adm registry -h
            
            View details with 'oc describe <resource>/<name>' or list resources with 'oc get all'.
=== RUN   TestNewAppRunAll/emptyDir_volumes
    --- FAIL: TestNewAppRunAll/emptyDir_volumes (0.28s)
        newapp_test.go:908: emptyDir volumes: Error mismatch! Expected <nil>, got unable to locate any images in the container image registry with name "mysql"
=== RUN   TestNewAppNewBuildEnvVars/explicit_environment_variables_for_buildConfig_and_deploymentConfig
    --- FAIL: TestNewAppNewBuildEnvVars/explicit_environment_variables_for_buildConfig_and_deploymentConfig (0.90s)
        newapp_test.go:1854: explicit environment variables for buildConfig and deploymentConfig: Error mismatch! Expected <nil>, got [unable to locate any images in the container image registry with name "centos/ruby-25-centos7", unable to locate any images in the container image registry with name "openshift/nodejs-010-centos7"]

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_oc/491/pull-ci-openshift-oc-master-unit/1286353146217500672

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Jul 23, 2020

/retest

3 similar comments
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Jul 23, 2020

/retest

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Jul 23, 2020

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Jul 24, 2020

/retest

return false, err
}

kclientcmd.UseModifyConfigLock = false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also it's just one place, which works for all commands.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Jul 24, 2020

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Jul 24, 2020

Split please the react commit and updated completions.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

27 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a695d74 into openshift:master Aug 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants