Skip to content

RFE-821 - Adding to the support section.#23316

Merged
bobfuru merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
pneedle-rh:troubleshooting_guide
Jul 27, 2020
Merged

RFE-821 - Adding to the support section.#23316
bobfuru merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
pneedle-rh:troubleshooting_guide

Conversation

@pneedle-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh commented Jun 26, 2020

Applies to enterprise-4.5 onward. This is the first phase of a new Troubleshooting Guide for OCP 4. Initially content is being added to the Support book.

This relates to https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-821.

Previews available at:

https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/getting-support.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/gathering-cluster-data.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/summarizing-cluster-specifications.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-installations.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/verifying-node-health.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-crio-issues.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-operator-issues.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/investigating-pod-issues.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-s2i.html
https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/troubleshooting/diagnosing-oc-issues.html

@pneedle-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@openshift/team-documentation for peer review please. Please can someone also add 'Peer Review Needed', 'branch/enterprise-4.5', 'labels and 'Next Release' milestone? Thanks!'. This content is for enterprise-4.5 onward.

@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh force-pushed the troubleshooting_guide branch 3 times, most recently from c752422 to b339ca5 Compare June 26, 2020 16:01
@openshift-docs-preview-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

The preview will be available shortly at:

@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh force-pushed the troubleshooting_guide branch from b339ca5 to 563d96e Compare June 26, 2020 16:11
@bobfuru bobfuru self-requested a review June 26, 2020 16:30
@bobfuru bobfuru added this to the Future Release milestone Jun 26, 2020
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sferich888 sferich888 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great, I have a few nits, here and there but overall this is a strong foundation for us to build on.

Comment thread modules/checking-load-balancer-configuration.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/checking-load-balancer-configuration.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/copying-files-pods-and-containers.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-application-diagnostic-data.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-application-diagnostic-data.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/support-submitting-a-case.adoc Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a way this can automatically be generated?

@deads2k @mfojtik

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@deads2k @mfojtik can you please confirm this? Thanks!

Comment thread modules/upi-installation-considerations.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/gathering-cluster-data.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/gathering-cluster-data.adoc Outdated
@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh force-pushed the troubleshooting_guide branch from 563d96e to bfd24c8 Compare June 26, 2020 17:49
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bobfuru bobfuru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey Paul - This is an unparalleled effort and will be an enormous asset to our customers. Thanks for letting me review it.

My comments are mostly of the nitpick variety, calling out a few of our OCP and ISG style conventions, such as serial commas and using attributes like {product-title} wherever possible.

You'll also see at times where I suggested adding some more articles to the verbiage, such as "Gather the journald unit logs" rather than "Gather journald unit logs". I think this would help make it sound more human-to-human, but you may have chosen to exclude some of this language to cut down on length or to conform to troubleshooting/support norms, which would be understandable.

Let me know if you need clarification or want to discuss anything further. Great work, Paul!

Comment thread _topic_map.yml Outdated
Comment thread modules/about-crio.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/about-installation-procedure.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/about-installation-procedure.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/about-sosreport.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/investigating-pod-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/investigating-pod-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/investigating-pod-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/verifying-node-health.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/accessing-running-pods.adoc Outdated
@bobfuru bobfuru added the peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR label Jun 26, 2020
@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh force-pushed the troubleshooting_guide branch 4 times, most recently from b5902d9 to e2a8cba Compare June 29, 2020 13:04
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments from a run through of a few of the sections

Comment thread _topic_map.yml Outdated
Comment thread support/diagnosing-oc-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/understanding-oc-log-levels.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/verifying-crio-status.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/specifying-oc-log-levels.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/verifying-crio-status.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/querying-kubelet-status-on-a-node.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/querying-kubelet-status-on-a-node.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-operator-logs.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-operator-logs.adoc Outdated
@pneedle-rh pneedle-rh force-pushed the troubleshooting_guide branch 11 times, most recently from ae16a11 to c4f665d Compare June 29, 2020 16:32
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Last batch of comments. Ton of great info here!

Comment thread modules/querying-kubelet-status-on-a-node.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/querying-kubelet-status-on-a-node.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/summarizing-cluster-specifications-through-clusterversion.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/specifying-openshift-installer-log-levels.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/specifying-openshift-installer-log-levels.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/investigating-kubelet-api-installation-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/investigating-master-node-installation-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/investigating-worker-node-installation-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/investigating-master-node-installation-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/troubleshooting-installations.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/investigating-etcd-installation-issues.adoc Outdated
@sunilcio
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pneedle-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

For this troubleshooting-operator-issues doc, Operator subscription condition types and Viewing Operator subscription status using the CLI are only for the application operators, which managed by OLM. We should explain this point, not all operators have the subsciption object.
And, tthe rest parts are for all operators, includes the CVO, the operators managed by the CVO.

@jianzhangbjz thank you for highlighting this. I have now made this clearer in the description in the assembly. I have also added a note at the base of both of those modules highlighting this point.

@pneedle-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/remote_health_monitoring/showing-data-collected-by-remote-health-monitoring.html#showing-data-collected-from-the-cluster_showing-data-collected-by-remote-health-monitoring
bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856781

Thank you @juzhao for filing the Bugzilla. I have subsequently assigned the BZ to myself and applied the requested changes through this current PR. Please review the BZ from a QE perspective. Thanks!

@sunilcio
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sunilcio
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@juzhao
Copy link
Copy Markdown

juzhao commented Jul 20, 2020

https://troubleshooting_guide--ocpdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/support/remote_health_monitoring/showing-data-collected-by-remote-health-monitoring.html#showing-data-collected-from-the-cluster_showing-data-collected-by-remote-health-monitoring
bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856781

Thank you @juzhao for filing the Bugzilla. I have subsequently assigned the BZ to myself and applied the requested changes through this current PR. Please review the BZ from a QE perspective. Thanks!

LGTM and bug is moved to VERIFIED

Comment thread modules/support-collecting-network-trace.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/querying-bootstrap-node-journal-logs.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/querying-bootstrap-node-journal-logs.adoc Outdated
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@pneedle-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@xltian I believe I have now responded to each of the QE comments from the team in this document. Can you please let me know whether there are any more QE reviews to go? Can you please confirm whether the QE team are now happy for this PR to be merged? Thanks!

@zhouying7780
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Look good to me for modules/specifying-oc-log-levels.adoc

Comment thread modules/querying-bootstrap-node-journal-logs.adoc Outdated
@jinyunma
Copy link
Copy Markdown

looks good to me for  "troubleshooting-installations" section

@wsun1
Copy link
Copy Markdown

wsun1 commented Jul 24, 2020

@pneedle-rh , most of sections look good to QE, once @gpei 's comment is resolved, QE is fine for this PR.

@pneedle-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@pneedle-rh , most of sections look good to QE, once @gpei 's comment is resolved, QE is fine for this PR.

Thank you @wsun1, that is great. I have now resolved @gpei's comment.

@bobfuru @bergerhoffer can you please let me know if you have any further suggestions before this PR is merged? A number of changes were made following QE review. Thanks!

Comment thread modules/support-submitting-a-case.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/support-submitting-a-case.adoc Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@adellape adellape left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NICE. 😙:ok_hand:

Comment thread modules/gathering-operator-logs.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-operator-issues.adoc Outdated
Comment thread support/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-operator-issues.adoc Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bobfuru bobfuru left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! A couple of places where the formatting was off but the rest of my comments are tiny nits. Thanks for letting me review this again.

Comment thread modules/support-submitting-a-case.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/support-submitting-a-case.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/support-submitting-a-case.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-crio-logs.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/support-collecting-network-trace.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-crio-logs.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-operator-logs.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/about-crio.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-operator-logs.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/gathering-application-diagnostic-data.adoc Outdated
@pneedle-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

pneedle-rh commented Jul 27, 2020

@bobfuru my understanding is that this PR has now passed through peer, SME and QE approval. If you are happy with my responses to your final review comments, can you please merge and CP for branch/enterprise-4.5 and branch/enterprise-4.6? Thanks!

@bobfuru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bobfuru commented Jul 27, 2020

LGTM

@bobfuru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bobfuru commented Jul 27, 2020

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bobfuru: #23316 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.5":

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bobfuru
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bobfuru commented Jul 27, 2020

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bobfuru: #23316 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.6":

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.5 branch/enterprise-4.6 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.