Add MachineSet infra and server group content#25837
Add MachineSet infra and server group content#25837maxwelldb merged 4 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
Conversation
|
The preview will be available shortly at: |
| ---- | ||
| <2> Specify the node label to add. | ||
| <3> Specify the infrastructure ID and node label. | ||
| <4> Enter the value that is returned when link:https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/16.0/html/command_line_interface_reference/server#server_group_create[creating a server group]. The server group must have `anti-affinity` or `soft-anti-affinity` policies. No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, while I can't imagine a reason for setting affinity or soft-affinity, any policy (or none) is fine as far as OpenShift is concerned.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd go like:
"Can be used to set an anti-affinity policy for the MachineSet".
|
@pierreprinetti How about 83aef78, then, if any policy works? Would it make sense to say that we recommend anti-affinity or soft-anti-affinity policies for most deployments, or is that too prescriptive? |
No Sir, that would be copacetic. |
|
@pierreprinetti TY. Added recommendation in 8838967. |
|
Thanks! @pierreprinetti |
|
/lgtm |
|
Thanks! |
|
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.5 |
|
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.6 |
|
@maxwelldb: #25837 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.6": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #26463 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
* Add MachineSet infra and server group content * Feedback tweak * Add recommended policies
Context:
@pierreprinetti Does this look copacetic to you?