Skip to content

BZ2103610 fixing taints, 9 BZs total#50662

Merged
maxwelldb merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
ShaunaDiaz:BZ2103610
Sep 21, 2022
Merged

BZ2103610 fixing taints, 9 BZs total#50662
maxwelldb merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
ShaunaDiaz:BZ2103610

Conversation

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz commented Sep 21, 2022 •
edited
Loading

This bug includes eight others and addresses an incorrect example in three modules. QE confirmed the reporter as correct in the first (#10) ticket.

Version(s):

  • PR applies to: 4.8+

Issues:
This fix (applied in three modules and several sections) is in reference to:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103610
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103611
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103612
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103613
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103614
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103615
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103616
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103617
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103618

Links to docs preview (not in order of bugs, in order they occur in docs for easier viewing):
https://50662--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations.html#nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations-about_nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations

https://50662--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations.html#nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations-about-seconds_nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations

https://50662--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations.html#nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations-about-multiple_nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations

https://50662--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations.html#nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations-about-taintBasedEvictions_nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations

https://50662--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations.html#nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations-adding_nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations

https://50662--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations.html#nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations-adding-machineset_nodes-scheduler-taints-tolerations

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 21, 2022
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Sep 21, 2022

🤖 Bots are busy building the preview. It will be available soon at:
https://50662--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/627

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ShaunaDiaz commented Sep 21, 2022

/label needs-peer-review

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 21, 2022

@ShaunaDiaz: The label(s) /label needs-peer-review cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, downstream-change-needed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, multi-arch, oadp, peer-review-done, peer-review-in-progress, peer-review-needed, rhacs, serverless, service-mesh, staff-eng-approved, telco

Details

In response to this:

/label needs-peer-review

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ShaunaDiaz commented Sep 21, 2022

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Sep 21, 2022
@maxwelldb maxwelldb self-assigned this Sep 21, 2022
@maxwelldb maxwelldb self-requested a review September 21, 2022 18:31
@maxwelldb maxwelldb added this to the Continuous Release milestone Sep 21, 2022
@maxwelldb maxwelldb added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Sep 21, 2022
@maxwelldb maxwelldb assigned ShaunaDiaz and unassigned maxwelldb Sep 21, 2022
@ShaunaDiaz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ShaunaDiaz commented Sep 21, 2022

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Sep 21, 2022
@maxwelldb maxwelldb merged commit 614eccb into openshift:main Sep 21, 2022
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

maxwelldb commented Sep 21, 2022 •
edited
Loading

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.8
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.9
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.10
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.11
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.12

e: Guess we can't do multi-command comments for cherry-pick.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2022
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 21, 2022

@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #50667

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.8
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.9
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.10
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.11
/cherry-pick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

maxwelldb commented Sep 21, 2022

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.9

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

maxwelldb commented Sep 21, 2022

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.10

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

maxwelldb commented Sep 21, 2022

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.11

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

maxwelldb commented Sep 21, 2022

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 21, 2022

@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #50669

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

This was referenced Sep 21, 2022
Merged
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 21, 2022

@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #50670

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2022
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 21, 2022

@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #50671

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Sep 21, 2022
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Sep 21, 2022

@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #50672

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Sep 21, 2022
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz deleted the BZ2103610 branch August 9, 2025 01:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@maxwelldb maxwelldb maxwelldb approved these changes

Assignees

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.8 branch/enterprise-4.9 branch/enterprise-4.10 branch/enterprise-4.11 branch/enterprise-4.12 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

Continuous Release

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@ShaunaDiaz @ocpdocs-previewbot @maxwelldb @openshift-cherrypick-robot