[enterprise-4.11] OCPBUGS-10717 removing RHV warning that does not apply to generic

[emarcusRH]

OCPBUGS#10717

Version(s):
enterprise-4.11
enterprise-4.10
enterprise-4.9

Issue: remove mistaken admin

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Build preview is available at:
https://57917--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/12528

[emarcusRH]

This PR removes an RHV note from a non-RHV module, and as such is in-line with typo-level doc updates. No dev or QE ack required.

[emarcusRH]

/label enterprise-4.11
/label enterprise-4.10
/label enterprise-4.9

[openshift-ci]

@emarcusRH: The label(s) /label enterprise-4.11 , /label enterprise-4.10 , /label enterprise-4.9 cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, peer-review-done, peer-review-in-progress, peer-review-needed, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/label enterprise-4.11
/label enterprise-4.10
/label enterprise-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[emarcusRH]

/label merge-review-needed

[emarcusRH]

needs to be cherry-picked into enterprise-4.10 and enterprise-4.9

[openshift-ci]

@emarcusRH: The label(s) /label branch/enterprise-4.10 cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, peer-review-done, peer-review-in-progress, peer-review-needed, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

Details

In response to this:

/label branch/enterprise-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[jeana-redhat]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #57934

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[jeana-redhat]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.9

[jeana-redhat]

note that this is getting the changes from #57659 into 4.9-4.11

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@jeana-redhat: new pull request created: #57935

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.