OSDOCS#6673: Add initial OLM v1 subdir by adellape · Pull Request #63086 · openshift/openshift-docs

adellape · 2023-08-02T21:28:34Z

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-6673

OCP 4.14

Creates a new subdir for OLM v1 (Technology Preview), which at this initial point includes:

About OLM v1: Intro to OLM v1 and sets context for what's actually available during this TP phase.
Packaging format: This is primarily re-using existing modules from the 4.12 TP phase of Platform Operators, which also used (an older version of) RukPak. The content will be updated for newer OLM v1 changes in a separate PR.
Managing catalogs: Contains procedures for creating file-based catalogs that use the new plain bundle type.

ocpdocs-previewbot · 2023-08-02T21:39:36Z

🤖 Updated build preview is available at:
https://63086--docspreview.netlify.app

Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/26654

jianzhangbjz · 2023-08-29T09:33:03Z

+    "name": "<extension_name>.v<version>",
+    "package": "<extension_name>",
+    "image": "quay.io/<organization_name>/<repository_name>:<image_tag>",
+    "properties": [


It's better to add the olm.gvk and olm.bundle.object types.

@jianzhangbjz why do we have to add those types? My assumption was that for plain bundle, they're not really required.

adellape · 2023-10-03T17:24:37Z

+
+After running OLM in production clusters for many releases, it became apparent that there is a desire to deviate from this coupling of CRDs and controllers to encompass the lifecycling of extensions that are not just Operators.
+
+Some of the goals of OLM v1 over the upcoming releases include improving Operator and extension lifecycle management in the following areas:


[re: avoiding future claims] Checking with PM on how/if we want to make any statements like this. Included it here to try to give a brief sense that this release is just a first step of what ultimately will feed into OLM v1's bigger picture when it's more fully-realized.

Assuming you get approval on the specifics of the plan/claim, the language seems fine to me.

jeana-redhat

Really nice stuff! Just a few issues here; a lot of this is just commentary/things to think about

/remove-label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed
/label peer-review-done

adellape · 2023-10-10T16:15:26Z

Because my #65963 and Michael's #65847 were branched off of this PR, I am going to merge this one as-is and then apply Jeana's peer review comments to my #65963, because I've done quite a bit of file-moving-around in that one.

adellape · 2023-10-10T16:17:57Z

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2023-10-10T16:18:44Z

@adellape: new pull request created: #66017

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci Bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 2, 2023

adellape changed the title ~~Add initial OLM v1 subdir~~ [WIP] OSDOCS#6673: Add initial OLM v1 subdir Aug 2, 2023

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 2, 2023

adellape added branch/enterprise-4.14 and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. labels Aug 2, 2023

adellape added this to the Planned for 4.14 GA milestone Aug 2, 2023

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 2, 2023

adellape force-pushed the plainv0_proc branch 2 times, most recently from 181b5a7 to 35c53e8 Compare August 8, 2023 20:11

michaelryanpeter reviewed Aug 14, 2023

View reviewed changes

Comment thread modules/olmv1-catalog-plain.adoc Outdated

adellape changed the title ~~[WIP] OSDOCS#6673: Add initial OLM v1 subdir~~ OSDOCS#6673: Add initial OLM v1 subdir Aug 21, 2023

openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 21, 2023

adellape force-pushed the plainv0_proc branch 3 times, most recently from 56c5e6e to 5a059b1 Compare August 28, 2023 18:51

jianzhangbjz reviewed Aug 29, 2023

View reviewed changes

adellape force-pushed the plainv0_proc branch 2 times, most recently from d9967e6 to eebb825 Compare August 29, 2023 17:15

adellape mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2023

Add OLM 1.0 relnote for 4.14 #63605

Merged

adellape force-pushed the plainv0_proc branch 2 times, most recently from 194e037 to 7ac1979 Compare October 3, 2023 16:50

Add OLMv1 dir and plain+v0 assembly

d357c10

adellape force-pushed the plainv0_proc branch from 7ac1979 to d357c10 Compare October 3, 2023 17:12

adellape commented Oct 3, 2023

View reviewed changes

adellape added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 3, 2023

jeana-redhat added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Oct 3, 2023

jeana-redhat reviewed Oct 3, 2023

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Oct 3, 2023

openshift-ci Bot removed the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 3, 2023

michaelryanpeter mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2023

[4.14] OLM 1.0 add catalog & install Operator procedures #65847

Closed

1 task

adellape merged commit 2d62321 into openshift:main Oct 10, 2023

adellape deleted the plainv0_proc branch October 10, 2023 16:17

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 10, 2023

[enterprise-4.14] OSDOCS#6673: Add initial OLM v1 subdir #66017

Merged

adellape mentioned this pull request Oct 20, 2023

OSDOCS#6669: Add OLM 1.0 arch/components #65963

Merged


		After running OLM in production clusters for many releases, it became apparent that there is a desire to deviate from this coupling of CRDs and controllers to encompass the lifecycling of extensions that are not just Operators.

		Some of the goals of OLM v1 over the upcoming releases include improving Operator and extension lifecycle management in the following areas:

Conversation

adellape commented Aug 2, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 2, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jianzhangbjz Aug 29, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rashmigottipati Sep 14, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

adellape Oct 3, 2023 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jeana-redhat Oct 3, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

adellape commented Oct 10, 2023

Uh oh!

adellape commented Oct 10, 2023

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 10, 2023

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants

adellape commented Aug 2, 2023 •

edited

Loading

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Aug 2, 2023 •

edited

Loading

adellape Oct 3, 2023 •

edited

Loading