Skip to content

OSDOCS#8989: Installing OLM on MicroShift#70359

Merged
kelbrown20 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
kelbrown20:OSDOCS-8989
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

OSDOCS#8989: Installing OLM on MicroShift#70359
kelbrown20 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
kelbrown20:OSDOCS-8989

Conversation

@kelbrown20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 commented Jan 16, 2024

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 16, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jan 16, 2024

🤖 Thu Feb 01 20:12:43 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://70359--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 force-pushed the OSDOCS-8989 branch 5 times, most recently from 7b54b85 to f1916ff Compare January 16, 2024 19:54
Comment thread modules/microshift-adding-olm-to-blueprint.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/microshift-adding-olm-to-blueprint.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/microshift-adding-olm-to-blueprint.adoc Outdated
@kelbrown20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@pmtk Hey Patryk! Was wondering if you could take a look at this PR when you get the chance? Thank you!

Comment thread modules/microshift-adding-olm-to-blueprint.adoc Outdated
Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc Outdated
@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 force-pushed the OSDOCS-8989 branch 2 times, most recently from 06df843 to c5b92d9 Compare January 23, 2024 15:45
@kelbrown20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@pmtk I believe I updated everything properly, can you take a look when you get the chance? Thank you!

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 changed the title [WIP]OSDOCS#8989: Installing OLM on MicroShift OSDOCS#8989: Installing OLM on MicroShift Jan 23, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 23, 2024
Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc Outdated
@pmtk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

pmtk commented Jan 24, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 24, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 25, 2024
@nalhadef
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed

@nalhadef
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label peer-review-done

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR label Jan 29, 2024
@nalhadef
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/remove-label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jan 29, 2024
Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc
Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DanielFroehlich DanielFroehlich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we are missing a section in "Embedding in a RHEL for Edge image for offline use" on how to add the olm container image to the blueprint, to get it from the release_version file. @pmtk , where is this currently? in the olm rpm, or in the new olm-release-info? Or did we decide to defer this until we have the new rpm package?

Comment thread modules/microshift-install-rpms-olm.adoc Outdated
Comment thread microshift_install/microshift-install-rpm.adoc
@dhensel-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Feb 1, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 1, 2024
@kelbrown20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think we are missing a section in "Embedding in a RHEL for Edge image for offline use" on how to add the olm container image to the blueprint, to get it from the release_version file. @pmtk , where is this currently? in the olm rpm, or in the new olm-release-info? Or did we decide to defer this until we have the new rpm package?

@DanielFroehlich Thank you for the review Daniel! Regarding the section "Embedding in a RHEL for Edge image for offline use", that section is being added by Shauna in this story OSDOCS-8990, so it won't be updated in this PR.

@kelbrown20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest

@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 force-pushed the OSDOCS-8989 branch 5 times, most recently from c268c17 to c41e730 Compare February 1, 2024 19:55
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 1, 2024

@kelbrown20: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DanielFroehlich DanielFroehlich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2024
@kelbrown20 kelbrown20 merged commit d480691 into openshift:main Feb 2, 2024
@kelbrown20
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kelbrown20: new pull request created: #71140

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.15 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants