OCPBUGS-1088: Run collect-profile pod on management nodes#394
Conversation
Problem: The collect-profiles pod spec is missing the "target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation. As a result when the workload partitioning feature is enabled on SNO, this pod resources will not get mutated and pinned to the reserved cpuset. Solution: Add the target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation to the collect-profiles pod. Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene <greene.al1991@gmail.com>
|
@awgreene: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1088, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@awgreene: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1088, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@awgreene: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1088, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awgreene, timflannagan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/hold |
|
I spoke with Brent Rowsell (who submitted the original bug) and found out that the behavior observed in my previous comment is expected on standard openshift clusters. /unhold |
|
/retest |
|
/label qe-approved |
|
/bugzilla refresh The requirements for Bugzilla bugs have changed (BZs linked to PRs on main branch need to target OCP 4.12), recalculating validity. |
|
@openshift-bot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request. Retaining the bugzilla/valid-bug label as it was manually added. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/jira refresh The requirements for Jira bugs have changed (Jira issues linked to PRs on main branch need to target OCP 4.12), recalculating validity. |
|
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1088, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1088, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@awgreene I modified the jira issue to fix the jira validation here. This means we'll probably have to clone it and backport to 4.12, etc. |
|
/retest |
|
@awgreene: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@awgreene: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-1088 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
) Bumps [k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver](https://github.com/kubernetes/apiextensions-apiserver) from 0.32.0 to 0.32.1. - [Release notes](https://github.com/kubernetes/apiextensions-apiserver/releases) - [Commits](kubernetes/apiextensions-apiserver@v0.32.0...v0.32.1) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Upstream-repository: api Upstream-commit: be2f37491084c5fac6680bb2f6cf29985bb0564c
Problem:
The collect-profiles pod spec is missing the
"target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation. As a result when the workload partitioning feature is enabled on SNO, this pod resources will not get mutated and pinned to the reserved cpuset.
Solution:
Add the target.workload.openshift.io/management:" annotation to the collect-profiles pod.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Greene greene.al1991@gmail.com