NO-ISSUE: [release-4.14] Backport e2e fixes to 4.14#674
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
b54d96b to
807dac9
Compare
|
/lgtm |
8f56d6d to
5a081f0
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
9cf34d1 to
f39517c
Compare
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
f39517c to
c7d2b42
Compare
|
/retest |
The internal versions of the API Extensions client objects are what client calls get converted into for processing within the server. This mechanism allows many different clients to use many different outward-facing versions, while the code within the server only ever runs against one type. There is no utility to these types outside of the server, especially for code that's making client calls. We can simply use the client-facing types and not require coversion anywhere. Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 935fc47c13f21e505e1f52e82faeaccd70861425
Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <dfranz@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 6b6e3fbd724ddb6bfb1e31f75d3cac2a25cc5b86
Fix #3108 The Subscription needs to be deleted before deleting the CSV, otherwise the Subscription will recreate the CSV, and subsequently, the CR/CRBs are not deleted. Update some test logging as well. Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 8215c7f3fe16b1135ddfc9de1d498fff2f75e659
c7d2b42 to
9a51030
Compare
Fix #3151 Remove non-InstallPlan related checks for this test. Also: * Clean up some looping log messages * Clean up some logging added when comments were converted These comments/logs are at the beginning of the test, and are also part of the test sequence, so they are redundant (and possibly confusing) Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 5299830576c8e8e6cd728b08a3a2e60f212ba387
9a51030 to
e49a97c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 85d9de20d53b025ed62ec2fa0ab7fd8980669fb8
f5fc43b to
55e6a18
Compare
|
@perdasilva: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/backport-risk-assessed This PR contains no changes to product code, so this is a no-op for QE. Adding that label as well. |
|
Forgot one! /label jira/valid-bug |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build operator-registry-container-v4.14.0-202402151739.p0.g84c3b96.assembly.stream.el8 for distgit operator-registry. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.14.0-202402151739.p0.g84c3b96.assembly.stream.el8 for distgit operator-lifecycle-manager. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.13 |
|
@perdasilva: #674 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.13": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
NO-ISSUE: [release-4.14] Backport e2e fixes to 4.14
NO-ISSUE: [release-4.14] Backport e2e fixes to 4.14
|
/cherry-pick release-4.13 |
|
@perdasilva: #674 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.13": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
NO-ISSUE: [release-4.14] Backport e2e fixes to 4.14
e2e-test backport based on #670 + another fix for a CRD flake test
This PR only changes e2e tests in an effort to make CI more reliable and reduce our time-to-merge.
This PR does not carry the bug fix from #670 - product changes are to be made by this PR.
Reviewers: please ensure all changes are under staging/operator-lifecycle-manager/test