Skip to content

OCPBUGS-31547: UPSTREAM: <carry>: disable collect-profiles cronjob#724

Closed
kevinrizza wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
kevinrizza:disable-collectprofiles
Closed

OCPBUGS-31547: UPSTREAM: <carry>: disable collect-profiles cronjob#724
kevinrizza wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
kevinrizza:disable-collectprofiles

Conversation

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We've made some significant perf improvements in the last release and this job is challenging to maintain. Disabling it for now, but leaving the bits to potentially serve it if we want to manually configure the job on a customer cluster

This has historically been difficult to explain to customers and at the moment provides tenuous value

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kevinrizza: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

We've made some significant perf improvements in the last release and this job is challenging to maintain. Disabling it for now, but leaving the bits to potentially serve it if we want to manually configure the job on a customer cluster

This has historically been difficult to explain to customers and at the moment provides tenuous value

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Mar 29, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from anik120 and dinhxuanvu March 29, 2024 13:33
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 29, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@everettraven everettraven left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 29, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 29, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: everettraven, kevinrizza

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD c25e535 and 2 for PR HEAD cf59819 in total

@kevinrizza kevinrizza force-pushed the disable-collectprofiles branch from cf59819 to d603561 Compare March 29, 2024 15:36
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 29, 2024
@kevinrizza kevinrizza changed the title NO-ISSUE: UPSTREAM: <carry>: disable collect-profiles cronjob OCPBUGS-31547: UPSTREAM: <carry>: disable collect-profiles cronjob Mar 29, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kevinrizza: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31547, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

We've made some significant perf improvements in the last release and this job is challenging to maintain. Disabling it for now, but leaving the bits to potentially serve it if we want to manually configure the job on a customer cluster

This has historically been difficult to explain to customers and at the moment provides tenuous value

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 29, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from jianzhangbjz March 29, 2024 15:49
@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test pass, details: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-31547
/lgm
/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Apr 1, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kevinrizza: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31547, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jianzhangbjz

Details

In response to this:

We've made some significant perf improvements in the last release and this job is challenging to maintain. Disabling it for now, but leaving the bits to potentially serve it if we want to manually configure the job on a customer cluster

This has historically been difficult to explain to customers and at the moment provides tenuous value

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b8e1c91 and 2 for PR HEAD d603561 in total

We've made some significant perf improvements in the last release
and this job is challenging to maintain. Disabling it for now, but leaving
the bits to potentially serve it if we want to manually configure the job
on a customer cluster.

For the microshift manifests, deleting the manifest entirely because there
is no cvo for microshift

Signed-off-by: Kevin Rizza <krizza@redhat.com>
@kevinrizza kevinrizza force-pushed the disable-collectprofiles branch from d603561 to 1bd9676 Compare April 1, 2024 15:39
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 1, 2024
@grokspawn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

these failures seem like cluster initialization issues, not something specific to this pull request

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn

@grokspawn
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

1 similar comment
@tmshort
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tmshort commented Apr 4, 2024

/retest

@tmshort
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

tmshort commented Apr 4, 2024

We're just disabling? Not removing the code as well?

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

We're just disabling? Not removing the code as well?

The intention is to prevent the cronjob from running so that this is no longer always happening on every cluster. It still seems useful to me as a potential data point if we want to do profiling on a specific customer cluster without having to give them special compiled bits

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@perdasilva
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

@perdasilva
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 8, 2024
@perdasilva
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Apr 8, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 215fb45 and 2 for PR HEAD 1bd9676 in total

@perdasilva
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Failure looks legit:

{  fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/operators/certs.go:115]: Unexpected error:
    <errors.aggregate | len:1, cap:1>: 
    secrets/pprof-cert[openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager] MISSING tls.crt content
    
    [
        <*errors.errorString | 0xc001a936e0>{
            s: "secrets/pprof-cert[openshift-operator-lifecycle-manager] MISSING tls.crt content\n",
        },
    ]
occurred
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1}

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 279155f and 1 for PR HEAD 1bd9676 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 62c1ae8 and 0 for PR HEAD 1bd9676 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 12, 2024

@kevinrizza: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn 1bd9676 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/hold

Revision 1bd9676 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 12, 2024
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

closing in favor of #730

@kevinrizza kevinrizza closed this Apr 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@kevinrizza: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-31547. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

We've made some significant perf improvements in the last release and this job is challenging to maintain. Disabling it for now, but leaving the bits to potentially serve it if we want to manually configure the job on a customer cluster

This has historically been difficult to explain to customers and at the moment provides tenuous value

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.