[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-35219: Unblock CI#767
[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-35219: Unblock CI#767openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 8 commits intoopenshift:release-4.16from
Conversation
… they break naming conventions (#3260) Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 3e0230e983397a49306f9f69c6a4561c28fbe67e
* patch flakes Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> * Update test/e2e/subscription_e2e_test.go Co-authored-by: Mikalai Radchuk <509198+m1kola@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Mikalai Radchuk <509198+m1kola@users.noreply.github.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 161b89ca70027d720347ee9ce7729df4018584ba
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
* parameterize e2e target Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> * pin opm image Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> * update default chart values to point to pinned opm image Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 1f5e0dc8e55aba20f3cd637e0b021f081e5761bb
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 71056b532cdea2baa41e78d83635b9980fc0a49b
* update skopeo openshift test Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> * patch subscription e2e flake Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 37dcff4328d76e7307225bffb4620f3f1282d7c3
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
e70f20b to
1faa168
Compare
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: a5230c70dcb90ed25441b72b9b646122ce4bf2c9
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Co-authored-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com> Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager Upstream-commit: 1404e916dec89d24c5ecfe52fec7f8f093fb917d
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
|
@perdasilva: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
@perdasilva: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
@perdasilva: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged: These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35219 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build operator-lifecycle-manager-container-v4.16.0-202406112107.p0.g1aacee6.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit operator-lifecycle-manager. |
Description
This PR unblocks the 4.16 pipeline by:
Notes
I manually created and pushed quay.io/olmtest/test-catalog:v1.39.0 and it is statically pinned in the e2e command:
I'm currently fixing up the upstream jobs to automagically manage the e2e test fixture images ref. So, I'll need to follow up with that to make it :chefs-kiss: