Skip to content

Conversation

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

RE openshift/console-operator#246
Extending initial exceptions in #23231

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 15, 2019
@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen changed the title Add ConsoleLogLinks to exceptions list for Console CRDs [WIP] Add ConsoleLogLinks to exceptions list for Console CRDs Jul 15, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 15, 2019
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhamilto @spadgett fyi but held.

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen force-pushed the console/rbac/group-rules/crd-exception-for-log-links branch from 3903fa2 to bc90d7b Compare July 17, 2019 17:30
@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen force-pushed the console/rbac/group-rules/crd-exception-for-log-links branch from bc90d7b to 98d6efd Compare July 17, 2019 19:09
// These custom resources are used to extend console functionality
// The console team is working on eliminating this exception in the near future
rbacv1helpers.NewRule(read...).Groups(consoleGroup).Resources("consoleclidownloads", "consolelinks", "consolenotifications").RuleOrDie(),
rbacv1helpers.NewRule(read...).Groups(consoleGroup).Resources("consoleclidownloads", "consolelinks", "consoleexternalloglinks", "consolenotifications").RuleOrDie(),
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spadgett @rhamilto @jhadvig currently on consoleexternalloglinks. I believe we are settled on this.

@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Jul 18, 2019

image

/retest

This is fine. @bparees gets to merge.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Jul 18, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 18, 2019
Copy link
Member

@spadgett spadgett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benjaminapetersen, bparees, spadgett

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen changed the title [WIP] Add ConsoleLogLinks to exceptions list for Console CRDs Add ConsoleLogLinks to exceptions list for Console CRDs Jul 18, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 18, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

could not print execution order: could not sort nodes: steps are missing dependencies

/retest

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

benjaminapetersen commented Jul 18, 2019

/retest

pretty sure this is a flake:

could not print execution order: could not sort nodes: steps are missing dependencies
--

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm. origin queue looks stuck yet, prob should have waited.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

2 similar comments
@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

@spadgett
Copy link
Member

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants