Skip to content

[release-4.3] Bug 1765294: Increase timeout for Dockercfg tests#24329

Closed
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.3from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-24278-to-release-4.3
Closed

[release-4.3] Bug 1765294: Increase timeout for Dockercfg tests#24329
openshift-cherrypick-robot wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.3from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-24278-to-release-4.3

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This is an automated cherry-pick of #24278

/assign adambkaplan

Increase to 10 minutes to cover full relist window.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1765294, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.3.0" release, but it targets "4.4.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1765294 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.3] Bug 1765294: Increase timeout for Dockercfg tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 19, 2019
@adambkaplan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@adambkaplan adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 20, 2019
@adambkaplan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/assign @bparees

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 20, 2019
@bparees
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

bparees commented Dec 20, 2019

@adambkaplan i'm stil not convinced of the value of this since the relist isn't actually going to do anything about missed delete events, right?

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

The requirements for Bugzilla bugs have changed, recalculating validity.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1765294, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.3.0" release, but it targets "4.4.0" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1765294 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

The requirements for Bugzilla bugs have changed, recalculating validity.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@adambkaplan
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/close

Assuming build tests pan out, openshift/openshift-controller-manager#61 should have a permanent solution.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@adambkaplan: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

Assuming build tests pan out, openshift/openshift-controller-manager#61 should have a permanent solution.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants