Skip to content

Conversation

@fedepaol
Copy link
Member

Some tests rely on the TestContext IPFamily field, that is being initialized in the upstream ginkgo suites but not in origin's one.
Here we add the initialization in initializeTestFramework based on config.HasIPV6 / config.HasIPV4.

This is the manual cherry-pick of #26140

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 30, 2021

@fedepaol: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1988264, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1956989 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1956989 targets the "4.9.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (anusaxen@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1988264: initializeTestFramework: initialize TextContext ip family

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 30, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from pweil- and smarterclayton July 30, 2021 08:20
@fedepaol
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @danwinship

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from danwinship July 30, 2021 08:20
@fedepaol
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 30, 2021
@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 30, 2021
@fedepaol
Copy link
Member Author

fedepaol commented Aug 4, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 4, 2021
@fedepaol
Copy link
Member Author

fedepaol commented Aug 4, 2021

/retest

`\[sig-network\]\[Feature:Router\] The HAProxy router should serve the correct routes when scoped to a single namespace and label set`,
`\[sig-network\]\[Feature:Router\] The HAProxy router should set Forwarded headers appropriately`,
`\[sig-network\]\[Feature:Router\] The HAProxy router should support reencrypt to services backed by a serving certificate automatically`,
`\[sig-network\] Networking should provide Internet connection for containers \[Feature:Networking-IPv6\]`,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this needs to remain in [Disabled:Broken] as in #26362

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm cancel
(as above, one of the skips needs to be changed to basically merge in a later fix from master)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 23, 2021
Some tests rely on the TestContext IPFamily field, that is being
initialized in the upstream ginkgo suites but not in origin's one.
Here we add the initialization in initializeTestFramework based on
config.HasIPV6 / config.HasIPV4.

Signed-off-by: Federico Paolinelli <fpaoline@redhat.com>
@fedepaol
Copy link
Member Author

/lgtm cancel
(as above, one of the skips needs to be changed to basically merge in a later fix from master)

Done

@fedepaol
Copy link
Member Author

@danwinship ptal

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 30, 2021

@fedepaol: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips 2b977c1 link /test e2e-aws-fips
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade 2b977c1 link /test e2e-aws-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, fedepaol
To complete the pull request process, please assign smarterclayton after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @smarterclayton in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ardaguclu
Copy link
Member

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 9, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2021

@fedepaol: PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 9, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 8, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Feb 7, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2022

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2022

@fedepaol: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1988264. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1988264: initializeTestFramework: initialize TextContext ip family

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants